Translate

lunes, 26 de abril de 2010

Antibiotics - A Review of ED Use

Author: Katherine M Hiller, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of ArizonaCoauthor(s): James Li, MD, Former Assistant Professor, Division of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Board of Directors, Remote Medicine

Golden Rules of ED Antibiotic Use
Antibiotic therapy ideally is determined by isolation of the offending organism and determination of its antibiotic susceptibility pattern. This information is usually not available in the acute setting of the emergency department (ED), and it is often necessary to make treatment decisions without precise knowledge of infectious source or microbial species. In certain cases (eg, suspected meningitis, gram-negative sepsis, bacterial peritonitis, pneumonia), early empiric therapy may be lifesaving.
The choice of an antimicrobial agent should always be based on the most likely involved organism. Guides, such as the Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy, are useful in suggesting initial therapy and may be supplemented by knowledge of a certain hospital's susceptibility patterns. Frequently, more than one antibiotic regimen is appropriate for the disease process.
The authors recommend that emergency physicians familiarize themselves with a short list of inexpensive and established antibiotics. These should be considered the main arsenal against microbial disease and, except in unusual circumstances, should be used before other treatments.
Antibiotics prescribed but not taken are worth little to a sick patient. Compliance can be optimized by optimizing drug formulation and minimizing frequency of dosing, duration of treatment, unpleasant side effects, and cost.
For these reasons, single-dose courses administered in the ED (eg, benzathine penicillin, cefixime, ciprofloxacin, fluconazole, metronidazole) greatly improve compliance over traditional multiday multidose regimens.1,2
Throughout this article, antibiotics appearing in boldface are favored by the authors because of their availability, cost, dosing schedule, and spectrum of coverage.
Finally, where possible, pricing for medications has been included as an educational resource for both healthcare workers and patients. Injectable drug prices are current as of 2009 and are taken from the national "Average Wholesale Price" database used by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. International price comparisons are taken from the International drug price guide. Oral drug prices are taken from national prescription vendors, and include, where applicable, the $4/course formularies adopted in 2008 by WalMart, Hannaford Grocers, KMart, and Rite Aid Pharmacies.Note: A one-page reference table with key therapy recommendations taken from this article can be downloaded in Adobe Acrobat format by clicking the Antibiotics Guidelines Summary.
Recent Updates From the Medical Literature
A late influenza season in 2008-09 and the first influenza pandemic in 40 years in 2009-10 prompted a closer look at the use of antivirals for influenza. In general, antivirals for influenza are only effective if begun within 24-48 hours of onset of symptoms and even then confer at most 3-5 days fewer symptoms. Most healthy persons with illness consistent with influenza do not need antiviral medication. The CDC recommends treating all patients hospitalized for influenza, all patients with lower tract infection or clinical deterioration, all patients younger than 2 years old or older than 65 years old, pregnant and postpartum women, and patients with chronic medical or immunosuppressive conditions.3 An IV neuraminidase inhibitor, peramivir, is now available for inpatient influenza treatment. Current recommendations are detailed later in this article.In 2007, the CDC updated treatment guidelines for gonococcal infection and associated conditions. Fluoroquinolones are no longer recommended to treat gonorrhea in the United States. The recommendation was based on analysis of new data from the CDC’s Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP). The data from GISP showed the proportion of gonorrhea cases in heterosexual men that were fluoroquinolone-resistant (QRNG) reached 6.7%, an 11-fold increase from 0.6% in 2001. This limits treatment of gonorrhea to drugs in the cephalosporin class (ceftriaxone 125 mg IM once as a single dose). Fluoroquinolones may be an alternative treatment option for disseminated gonococcal infection if antimicrobial susceptibility can be documented. For more information, see CDC Updated Gonococcal treatment recommendations.In 2006, the CDC also updated guidelines for tetanus immunization. Adults should receive Tdap instead of Td when receiving boosters during treatment of wounds. Click to jump to details.Penicillin allergy cross-reactivity with cephalosporins is significantly overstated. Cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins is much less than the 10-15% commonly cited. No cross reactivity exists between penicillins and third-generation cephalosporins. However, if a patient has known anaphylaxis to penicillin, caution with cephalosporin use still is warranted.4,5,6,7
Classically, quinolone antibiotics have been contraindicated in pediatric and pregnant populations due to the joint and cartilage destruction observed in multiple different animal models. Recent reviews of compassionate quinolone use both in the United States and abroad have proposed that this complication is probably not as common in the pediatric population. Approximately 1.5% of patients with cystic fibrosis given ciprofloxacin experienced self-limited arthralgias (also a complication of their disease process). None had joint or cartilage destruction.8 Currently, anthrax is the only FDA-approved indication for quinolones in the pediatric population.
Neisseria meningitidis has become a leading cause of bacterial meningitis in the United States after dramatic reductions in the incidence of Streptococcus pneumoniae that have been achieved using conjugate vaccines.9 A new tetravalent meningococcal vaccine may further alter the pattern of disease and change treatment recommendations during epidemics.
Resistant organisms continue to increase the need for innovative and effective treatments during severe infections. Some of the newer antibiotics on the horizon that may improve our treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) include linezolid, quinupristin, dalfopristin, and daptomycin.10 Additionally, older antibiotics, such as sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim and doxycycline, may play a role in treatment of MRSA.11 Treatment of simple cellulitis with intravenous (IV) antibiotics administered on a daily basis through the ED or through home health visits is as effective as inpatient treatment.12
Finally, the time of mandated blood cultures prior to administration of antibiotics may be ending. An increasing body of evidence demonstrates lack of clinical usefulness for such infections as pyelonephritis13 , cellulitis14 , and pneumonia15 . However, in the setting of undifferentiated bacteremia, blood should be cultured prior to starting treatment, unless this would cause undue delay. Increasing incidence of community-acquired MRSA may have impact on the value of cultures for certain infections.
Empiric Antibiotic Therapy
Broad-spectrum antibiotics
These agents are generally chosen for empiric treatment of potentially life-threatening infections of unknown bacterial origin. Single agents mostly are related to penicillin (eg, second- or third-generation cephalosporins, imipenem, beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors [BL/BLI]), with the exception of the newer generation fluoroquinolones and chloramphenicol. This last agent is used widely outside the United States because of its low cost and availability as an inexpensive oral treatment (<$0.01/250 mg tablet).
In the United States, chloramphenicol may be considered an alternative for cases of penicillin-resistant bacteria or for penicillin-allergic patients with sepsis or meningitis. Within the United States, large differences in cost exist between commonly used broad-spectrum antibiotics, as demonstrated by these prices: ceftriaxone ($11/2 g, $15/250 mg), cefotaxime ($23/2 g), imipenem ($82/1 g), ticarcillin/clavulanate ($17/3.1 g), piperacillin/tazobactam ($2/3.375 g), and ampicillin/sulbactam ($13/3 g).
Several new-generation fluoroquinolones have been introduced as powerful broad-spectrum antibiotics. Moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin are marketed and FDA approved for a wide variety of inpatient and ambulatory indications including chronic bronchitis, nosocomial and community-acquired pneumonia, diabetic foot infection, osteomyelitis, and uncomplicated urinary tract infection. These new agents distinguish themselves from older fluoroquinolones by their activity against gram-positive bacteria (eg, penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus); gram-negative bacteria, and anaerobes. Under most conditions, they achieve equal serum levels whether dosed orally or IV and are given in single daily doses.
Broad-spectrum agents should not be used empirically and indiscriminately for all infections. The major argument against such use is the development of resistant organisms. Routine use of broad-spectrum antibiotics for minor infections significantly adds to infection and colonization of the general population with increasingly hardy microbes that are difficult to treat. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) sources, indiscriminate use of broad-spectrum antibiotics more than doubles an individual's chance of acquiring future infection with a resistant organism. The relative risk increases from 3.1 to 5.6.16 For fluoroquinolones, this argument is even more important because resistance is mediated by a single plasmid, which confers resistance to the entire class of agents. Major resistance thus may rapidly be acquired, unless strict controls against widespread use are put into place.
For these reasons, the newer broad-spectrum fluoroquinolones should be reserved as second-line agents for use when traditional broad-spectrum antibiotics are contraindicated or have failed. This approach is similar to some hospital policies reserving use of antimicrobials such as vancomycin, ceftriaxone, and imipenem for special situations.17,18 From a patient-based perspective, such a policy will protect individuals from the more-than-doubled risk of future superinfection with a highly resistant organism. From a population-based perspective, this also will protect communities from multidrug-resistant endemics. Multidrug-resistant S aureus, Enterococcus species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, malaria, and tuberculosis are current examples of endemics resulting from indiscriminate utilization of antimicrobial therapy.
Cephalosporins
When in doubt, second- or third-generation cephalosporins are a good choice for many bacterial infections. Antimicrobial coverage is largely similar within this class and includes gram-positive, gram-negative, and strict anaerobic species. Coverage differences are minor and are primarily relevant if P aeruginosa is suspected (see Pseudomonal infection section). Examples of this class include cefmetazole, cefuroxime, cefoxitin, cefotetan, and cefamandole.
In certain hospitals, one second- or third-generation cephalosporin may be less expensive than others due to special agreements with the supplier. Use the least expensive one if there is significant cost savings. However, relative to the cost of IV setup (>$100), cost differences between cephalosporins may be small. Published average market prices to pharmacies for typical unit doses of these drugs are as follows: cefuroxime ($13/1.5 g), cefepime ($45/2 g), cefoxitin ($23/2 g), cefotaxime ($23/2 g), ceftazidime ($36/2 g), and ceftriaxone ($11/2 g).
Anaerobic coverage
Antibiotics with good anaerobic coverage include metronidazole (<$1/500 mg PO, $3/500 mg IV), clindamycin ($4/600 mg IV), and any BL/BLI (amoxicillin/clavulanate [$5/850 mg PO]; ampicillin/sulbactam [$13/3 g], piperacillin/tazobactam [$2/3.375 g]). For surgical and gynecologic cases in which soiled peritoneum is possible, metronidazole must be used because it is the only agent that covers Bacteroides fragilis, the most common colonic microbe. Although practically all antibiotics have been associated with Clostridium difficile colitis, clindamycin bears the dubious distinction of causing the most cases of this potentially fatal adverse effect. For this reason, metronidazole is the preferred agent for anaerobic coverage.

Pseudomonal coverage
If serious pseudomonal infection is suspected, double coverage is recommended. Antibiotics with activity against P aeruginosa include ceftazidime, ticarcillin, aminoglycosides, imipenem, meropenem, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. As for other antimicrobial regimens, the two agents chosen should be from different classes. For example, the combination of ticarcillin/ tobramycin is good, whereas a combination of ceftazidime and imipenem is not. Piperacillin/tazobactam is a poor choice for treating pseudomonal infections unless used in higher-than-normal doses and combined with an aminoglycoside. Deaths have been reported from pseudomonal infections when using manufacturer-recommended doses of this drug, even when combined with a second agent.
Antibiotic-resistant gram-positive cocci
Several species of resistant gram-positive cocci warrant special consideration. Many are sufficiently virulent that an incorrect choice of initial antibiotic may rapidly be fatal to the patient. Recent reports hallmark the increasing incidence of community-acquired MRSA. Such cases actually represent infection by one of two subspecies of S aureus that are genotypically and phenotypically distinct.
The more traditional nosocomially-acquired MRSA has also been identified in the community in increasing numbers. This strain of MRSA is multidrug resistant, making treatment a challenge. True community-acquired MRSA is a different strain of S aureus and (while resistant to methicillin) is susceptible to many common treatment regimens.
Vancomycin ($8/2 g) should be used initially for any suspected severe infection, including line sepsis, endocarditis, and meningitis. In special cases of severe infection, other newer agents may be used instead of vancomycin. These cases include patients who have been hospitalized within the past 24 months, have had outpatient visits within the past 12 months, have been admitted to a nursing home within the past 12 months, have been on antibiotics within the past 12 months, have undergone hemodialysis, have chronic illnesses, are intravenous drug users, or are in close contact with other persons with MRSA. Such patients may receive linezolid ($119/600 mg), or daptomycin ($248/500 mg) instead of vancomycin.If the patient has no risk factors for the nosocomial-type MRSA, antibiotics with historical effectiveness against S aureus may be used. These include nafcillin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ), and clindamycin. However, if any form of nosocomial-type MRSA is possible, treatment with vancomycin or newer agents should be continued until cultures exclude MRSA or, in the presence of MRSA, prove its sensitivity to other agents.
Minor infections with non-nosocomial-type community-acquired MRSA may be treated with a penicillinase-resistant penicillins (oxacillin, dicloxacillin), first-generation cephalosporins, TMP-SMZ, or tetracyclines.10 Coverage should be tailored by reviewing the local antibiogram for MRSA and should include streptococcal coverage when appropriate.
HIV-infected patients
Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia is the most common cause of pneumonia among all HIV-infected individuals. However, other pathogens must be considered because of the relative immunocompromise in these patients, particularly in those with diminished CD4+ cell counts. Pulmonary tuberculosis (TB), coccidioidomycosis, and other diseases present atypically in HIV-infected patients. In HIV-infected patients with cough, the presence of prior TB exposure, hemoptysis, nocturnal sweats, weight loss, or a previously positive purified protein derivative (PPD) skin test result should prompt rapid patient isolation in a negative-pressure room and initiation of a TB workup (ie, TB-specific blood cultures, sputum staining, and culture). For further information, see Tuberculosis.If suspicion is high, isolating such patients even without overt symptoms is sometimes appropriate. Chest radiographic findings can be normal in 20% of cases of HIV-associated pulmonary TB.
In patients with CD4+ counts less than 200/mm3 who are not receiving prophylaxis, IV TMP-SMZ should be used to cover Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP). Additionally, a 1990 report by the National Institutes of Health/University of California concluded that prednisone 40 mg by mouth twice daily has been shown to reduce mortality in patients with PCP when the PO2 is <70>35. Note that the mortality rate is high even with therapy: 10-20% in patients without hypoxia and 20-40% in patients with hypoxia.19
Gram-negative sepsis
Gram-negative sepsis is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality due to production of bacterial endotoxin. For presumptive treatment of life-threatening sepsis in adults, coverage for possible gram-negative bacteremia is recommended using two antibiotics with good gram-negative activity.20 Good choices include a third-generation cephalosporin or BL/BLI, plus a fluoroquinolone or an aminoglycoside. Examples of such coverage include ceftriaxone and gentamicin, or cefmetazole and ciprofloxacin. Many possible drug combinations are acceptable as long as the antibiotics are not of the same class.
Bacterial meningitis
In the setting of suspected meningitis, antibiotics should be initiated immediately, preferably before or at the same time cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is drawn for analysis.21 Antibiotics will not affect CSF cell counts for several hours, and more importantly, the patient will receive early treatment for a possibly rapidly progressive disease. For immune-competent adults, use a third-generation cephalosporin alone (ceftriaxone, $11/2g). For infants, elderly, or immunocompromised patients (eg, alcoholics, patients with renal failure), add ampicillin to cover Listeria monocytogenes. In regions with documented highly resistant pneumococcus, the CDC recommends adding vancomycin until culture results are available. In suspected herpes simplex encephalitis, especially in neonates, addition of acyclovir should be included empirically.22
Pneumonia
The American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) have both published guidelines for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).23,24 For outpatient treatment of pneumonia, both recommend either a macrolide (clarithromycin or azithromycin) or doxycycline. For outpatient treatment, the IDSA guidelines also suggest single-agent treatment with a respiratory fluoroquinolone. However, the ATS guidelines reserve single- and double-agent fluoroquinolone treatment (the latter with an added beta-lactam drug) for outpatient treatment of patients with pulmonary or cardiac comorbidities. The beta-lactam agent is suggested due to the greater prevalence and morbidity of gram-negative infection in this population. Ciprofloxacin is generally a poor choice for CAP due to its poor coverage of Streptococcus pneumoniae.25,26
Inpatient treatment regimens for pneumonia include monotherapy with a respiratory fluoroquinolone or combination therapy with both IV beta-lactam and macrolide agents together. For patients with no comorbidity and no risk factors for gram-negative organisms or drug-resistant Pneumococcus, ATS endorses monotherapy with IV azithromycin alone. The IDSA recommends that all treatment regimens for ICU-admitted patients include a beta-lactam. Patients with acute necrotizing pneumonia should receive vancomycin to cover MRSA. Both organizations' recommendations cover the 7 most likely pathogens causing pneumonia: S pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, S aureus, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella pneumoniae, and Chlamydia pneumoniae.
Institutionalized patients and patients with structural lung disease are at risk for pseudomonal pneumonia. For these and other patients at risk for such infection, at least two antipseudomonal antibiotics with activity against drug-resistant Pneumococcus and Legionella are warranted (eg, BL/BLI plus ciprofloxacin).
Other Respiratory Infections
Bronchitis
Unless the patient has COPD or another compelling reason, do not prescribe antibiotics for acute bronchitis.27,28 Acute bronchitis appears clinically similar to pneumonia (eg, fever, productive cough). However, examination and radiographic findings of pneumonia are lacking. Most of these cases are viral.29 Over-prescription of antibiotics in this population is a major source of resistance. It also doubles an individual patient's chance of later contracting a resistant infection.30 Consider making exceptions for patients with severe underlying disease (eg, congestive heart failure) who would be unable to tolerate the small risk of bacterial infection or for patients who are symptomatic for more than 10 days, in whom Mycoplasma infection becomes a greater possibility.
In contrast to the general guideline of withholding antibiotics for acute bronchitis, antibiotics are indicated for patients with COPD with an acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.31 Chronic bronchitis is defined as a productive cough for 3 or more months per year for 2 or more years. Acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis is defined as an increase in cough, sputum production, dyspnea, or wheezing. Fever is not usually present, and examination or radiographic findings of pneumonia are lacking. Recommendations include TMP-SMZ ($4/10-d course), azithromycin ($26/course), or doxycycline ($4/10-d course).
Except in streptococcal pharyngitis, doxycycline ($4/10-d course) or TMP-SMZ ($4/10-d course) are as effective for respiratory tract infections as any extended-spectrum oral cephalosporin (eg, cefuroxime, cefadroxil, cefpodoxime, and cefaclor), which are all prohibitively expensive ($97, $140, $114, and $114/10-d course, respectively). However, a generic version of cefaclor is available in some areas ($42/10-d course). Consequently, for pricing reasons, doxycycline or TMP-SMZ are recommended in any situation in which such cephalosporins are considered.32
Influenza
The majority of influenza cases are due to influenza A. Amantadine and rimantadine have been approved for many years for use against influenza A. However, since 2005, neither are recommended by the CDC because significant resistance has evolved for both drugs. Neuraminidase inhibitors, such as oseltamivir and zanamivir, have variable resistance patterns to seasonal influenza, and each are associated with significant gastrointestinal (oseltamivir) and respiratory (zanamivir) side effects.For the 2009-10 influenza season, the CDC recommends treating all patients hospitalized for influenza, all patients with lower tract infection or clinical deterioration, all patients younger than 2 years or older than 65 years, pregnant and postpartum women, and patients with chronic medical or immunosuppressive conditions.3 An IV neuraminidase inhibitor, peramivir, is now available for inpatient influenza treatment.Antivirals for influenza are only effective if begun within 24-48 hours of onset of symptoms, and even then confer at most 3-5 days of fewer symptoms. Most healthy persons with illness consistent with influenza do not need antiviral medication.Prophylaxis for influenza with antiviral medication may decrease disease and may be considered when the patient is at high risk for influenza-related complications and has had close contact with someone likely to have had influenza. However, the CDC recommends education on the signs and symptoms of influenza with instructions to initiate early treatment as a preferred strategy for control.
Common Outpatient Infections: Above the Belt
In late 1997, the CDC launched a major campaign to educate physicians and patients about the dangers of inappropriately using antibiotics for coughs, colds, and sore throats. New guidelines and patient brochures are being developed so physicians will be able to advise their patients while being supported by federal recommendations (see Images 1-3). Educational materials are available free of charge from the CDC at (404) 639-2215.

Sinusitis
Both physicians and patients over-diagnose acute sinusitis. Distinguishing it from chronic sinusitis, which has a different treatment and prognosis, is important. Acute sinusitis typically presents with nasal congestion, purulent nasal discharge, and facial pain. In the immunocompetent host, antibiotics are initially unnecessary.33 Initial treatment should consist of topical decongestants used every 4 hours, steam inhalations, saline flushes and advice to sleep in a semi-upright position to facilitate drainage if the maxillary sinus is involved. Antibiotics should be used in toxic-appearing patients, those in whom initial therapy fails, and patients with comorbid conditions.34 TMP-SMZ for 3 days is as effective as a traditional 10-day course ($4/course).35
Otitis media
Ironically, no type I scientific evidence exists for empiric treatment of otitis media, despite the fact that antibiotics are almost universally used in the United States for such infection. Standard of care in Europe is initial observation. However, antibiotic therapy in the United States has huge financial implications, accounting for $4 billion in annual costs and some 25% of all medical prescriptions.36
In a large review (n=5,400), 81% of patients with otitis media had spontaneous clinical resolution.37 Four studies found no difference in cure rate between traditionally prescribed oral antibiotic regimens and single-dose IM ceftriaxone, dosed 50 mg/kg.38,39,40 In the fourth study (RCT, n=648), investigators found that parents uniformly preferred IM dosing to the traditional course of oral antibiotics.41 Consider a single dose of ceftriaxone IM if antibiotics are to be used.
Pharyngitis
Acute pharyngitis is most commonly caused by viruses. However, in order to prevent rheumatic fever and its complications, group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngitis should be recognized and treated. For compliance reasons, single-dose benzathine penicillin ($56/1.2 mU) is recommended for GABHS pharyngitis or tonsillitis. The recommended dosage is 600,000 units intramuscularly for patients weighing 27 kg or less, and 1,200,000 units for patients weighing more than 27 kg. If oral penicillin must be used, twice-daily dosing has been found as effective as 4-time daily dosing ($8/500 mg bid for 10 d). A full 10-day course is necessary for eradication.42,43,44 Suitable alternatives for cases of penicillin allergy are oral erythromycin for 10 days ($10/course) or azithromycin 500 mg PO for one dose then 250 mg PO daily for 4 days ($26/course).
In some hospitals, rapid streptococcal antigen detection kits are available. They are highly specific but lack sensitivity. Therefore, a throat culture should always be sent when 48-hour follow-up is possible. Because throat cultures are often impractical for ED use, various criteria correlating clinical findings with positive cultures have been developed.45 According to one authority, patients should be treated in the emergency department for presumed GABHS when the incidence of GABHS pharyngitis and its complications are high, when patients are contacts of others with documented GABHS, in patients with scarlet fever, and in areas without adequate laboratory facilities to perform a rapid strep test.46 Another authority adds lack of cough to the list of accompanied findings but recommends empiric treatment if 2 or more of these 4 findings are present.47
Several trials have demonstrated shortened clinical courses of pharyngitis when steroids (dexamethasone, betamethasone, and prednisone) were coadministered with antibiotics.48,49,50 Antibiotics should always be administered with steroids in this setting to prevent overwhelming bacteremia. Death in a previously healthy adolescent has been reported from disseminated infection associated with adjunctive steroid treatment for pharyngitis.51 Steroids are not recommended in patients who are pregnant or have HIV, thrush, or ulcerative pharyngitis.
Common Outpatient Infections: Below the Belt
Urinary tract infections
A single dose or 3-day course TMP-SMZ is recommended for simple cases of cystitis ($1/single dose, $4/3-d course). In areas where resistance of Escherichia coli to TMP/SMX is greater than 10-20%, ciprofloxacin should be used instead.52 Use a 10-14-day course in patients who are male, preteen, older than 65 years, use a diaphragm, have diabetes, have recent recurrences of UTI, or have symptoms lasting more than a week. Pyelonephritis should be treated for 14 days.
Pelvic/vaginal infections
Treating vaginal candidiasis with a single dose of oral fluconazole (150 mg, $12/dose) is cheaper and more effective than topical preparations. Trichomoniasis and bacterial vaginosis can both be treated with a single oral dose of metronidazole ($3/2 g).
Distinguish pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) from simple cervicitis. Although the causative bacterial species are similar, outpatient PID should not be treated with single-dose oral agents but with IM ceftriaxone ($15/250 mg) plus doxycycline for 14 days ($4/course). If parenteral cephalosporin therapy is not feasible, use of fluoroquinolones (eg, levofloxacin 500 mg PO qd for 14 d [$195/course] or ofloxacin 400 mg PO bid for 14 d [$175/course]) with or without metronidazole (500 mg PO bid for 14 d [$4/course]) may be considered if the community prevalence and individual risk of gonorrhea is low. Increasing fluoroquinolone resistance in gonococcal isolates necessitates treatment regimens that do not rely on fluoroquinolones for gonococcal coverage. Tests for gonorrhea must be performed prior to instituting therapy and if positive, the patient managed without fluoroquinolone therapy.For more information see, Recent Updates From the Medical Literature.
Patients with suspected cervicitis must be treated for both gonococcal and chlamydial infection because co-infection exists in up to 40% of cases. Use cefixime 400 mg orally once plus azithromycin 1 g orally once ($39/1 g). Although the manufacturer of cefixime discontinued the drug in 2002, Lupin Limited began to re-manufacture cefixime in 2004. Supplies are still limited. As an alternative to the above regimen, 2 g of azithromycin in a single dose covers both gonococcal and chlamydial cervicitis; however, an increased incidence of gastrointestinal side effects exists. The single-dose regimens for chlamydia are recommended over the traditional 10-day doxycycline treatment because overall compliance with a 10-day regimen is dismal. In one survey, of 386 women given 10-day prescriptions of doxycycline for PID, only a third reported compliance. Of the rest, 41% stopped their medication after 4 days, and the remainder never filled their prescriptions.
Note that none of these therapies except for an extended course of doxycycline (14-d bid) adequately covers syphilis. Although the incidence of syphilis has diminished greatly in the United States, it has reemerged in recent years. A quarter of these cases occur in HIV-positive patients. In patients diagnosed with a sexually transmitted disease, consider obtaining syphilis serologic tests (eg, rapid plasma reagin [RPR], venereal disease research laboratory [VDRL]). Patients should have adequate follow-up in the event serologic testing demonstrates the disease. In 1998, the CDC changed its recommended treatment of primary syphilis from a single dose to 3 weekly doses of benzathine penicillin ($112/2.4 mU IM). In cases of neurosyphilis, recommended treatment is 2 weeks of inpatient IV penicillin (4 mU IV q4h).
Sexual assault
Give cefixime (400 mg single dose), plus azithromycin (1 g oral sachet once; $39), plus HBIG (0.06 mL/kg IM) if not vaccinated, plus Plan B or Ovral (2 tablets immediately and 2 tablets in 12 h). Consider promethazine for nausea.
Wounds, Bites, and High-Risk Exposures
The most important aspect of wound management in overall reduction of infection rate is mechanical cleansing. When possible, perform this using high-pressure irrigation (eg, 35 mL syringe and <19-gauge href="javascript:showcontent(">53,54 Soap and water may be equally effective in out-of-hospital settings. Noncontaminated facial and scalp lacerations do not need irrigation.55 Use a minimum of 200 mL; higher volumes are more effective. Avoid peroxide, Betadine, and chlorhexidine, which damage viable tissue.56 Half-strength peroxide swabbed on sutured wounds every 6 hours will reduce scarring from blood clot.57 Antibiotic ointment (eg, bacitracin) has been shown to reduce incidence of wound infections.58
Classify wounds as tetanus prone or not. Tetanus-prone wounds are deep, dirty, devitalized, or older than 6 hours. About 60 cases of tetanus occur in the United States per year, mostly in elderly patients whose immunity has waned. For tetanus-prone wounds, if the patient is not immunized (ie, <3>3 doses but last dose given >5 y prior), give active immunization only. For non–tetanus-prone wounds, give active immunization only, using 10 years as a cutoff. Active immunization is a combination tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap, 0.5 mL IM). This represents an updated recommendation by the CDC in 2006, and should be given to patients aged 11-64.59 In children younger than 8 years, give diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus (DPT) instead. Passive immunization is tetanus immune globulin (TIG) 500 units deep IM.
The literature provides 5 indications for prophylactic antibiotics in wounds. These include intraoral lacerations, complicated human or dog bites, cat bites, and foot puncture wounds. Although commonly used, little evidence exists that prophylactic antibiotics are useful for patients with significant comorbidities (eg, diabetes mellitus [DM]), cirrhosis, advanced age, immunosuppression).57 Prophylactic antibiotics are not indicated for missile wounds.60 When indicated, use an antibiotic with coverage for staphylococci as well as one that covers those species unique to the type of wound.
In high-risk wounds (eg, hand wound, those in immunocompromised patients, cat bite, wound in areas of reduced vascularity), give the initial dose of prophylactic antibiotic intravenously within 3 hours of injury for best efficacy. For bites, use a BL/BLI antibiotic for the initial IV dose (eg, ticarcillin/clavulanate 3.1 g or piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g).
A common wound encountered in the emergency department is the through-the-shoe puncture wound. This presents a 10% risk for infection, 90% from pseudomonads in wounds involving rubber-soled shoes. These infections can progress to osteomyelitis.46 Antibiotic prophylaxis is controversial.61 Ciprofloxacin has been suggested; however, it is too expensive for universal use and is contraindicated in children. An alternative is TMP-SMZ, which has mild activity against pseudomonads and other skin flora, and is inexpensive. All patients need instructions on self-wound checks and follow-up.
Prophylactic antibiotics are used to prevent, not treat, an infection, so therapy duration can be shortened. However, no consensus exists as to exact duration needed. The Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy suggests 3 days if no wound inflammation exists, or 3 days past the clearance of wound inflammation. Alternatively, give a 2-day course ending with a formal wound check. If the wound is infected at the time of reexamination, antibiotics can be continued.
Skin infections
Cephalexin is recommended by many (500 mg qid, $4/10-d course). For convenience, it may also be dosed 2 or 3 times daily, instead of the traditional 4 times daily (manufacturer's insert). Alternatives to cephalexin include dicloxacillin (250 mg qid, $22/10-d course), TMP-SMZ ($4/10 d), and doxycycline ($4/10d). The latter two may provide additional coverage against CA-MRSA species in regions where this has become endemic.
Bite wounds
Cats cause only 5% of bites presenting to emergency departments, but these bites are associated with a high risk of infection (80%). Most infections (80%) are caused by Pasteurella multocida, a pleomorphic gram-negative rod. For cat bites, amoxicillin/clavulanate 500 mg bid ($17/d) is recommended. Less costly alternatives include doxycycline 100 mg bid, penicillin V 500 mg bid/qid, and TMP-SMZ bid (all $4/course).
Dog bites cause the majority (90%) of bites presenting to emergency departments but are associated with a low risk of infection (5%). Dog maulings in the United States kill 18 persons annually; 60% occur in children younger than 11 years. In the United States, about 2% of the population is bitten annually; 800,000 people require medical attention.62 Infections are usually polymicrobial. Antibiotic prophylaxis has no proven benefit. However, the Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy suggests amoxicillin/clavulanate as above. Less costly alternatives include clindamycin 150 mg qid plus TMP-SMZ double strength (DS) bid. Treat patients who have been bitten by a dog and who have had a splenectomy with prophylactic penicillin due to increased risk of sepsis and death due to the rare bacterial species Capnocytophaga canimorsus.
Human bites comprise 3% of bites presenting to emergency departments and are associated with a 50% infection rate. Many human bites are clenched fist injuries, which are particularly high infection risks. Amoxicillin/clavulanate is recommended as above. The Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy suggests 5 days of prophylaxis. Patients discharged from the emergency department should have a follow-up check in 24 hours. Consider passive immunization for hepatitis B with immune globulin (HBIG) 0.06 mL/kg IM.
Rabies
An average of one human rabies case is reported annually in the United States, mostly in immigrants. In nonimmigrants, human rabies is almost entirely due to exposure to infected bats. Other high-risk animals include skunks, raccoons, foxes, and wild carnivores. Treat patients with bites from all of these animals for rabies. Only a fraction of rabid animals are domesticated, and nearly half of all rabid animals are raccoons.63 Interestingly, only one human rabies case from raccoons has ever been reported.64 Low-risk animals include dogs and cats.
Because of pet vaccination, an observed 8,000 canine cases of rabies in 1946 dropped to 128 in 1988. Do not treat patients with these bites unless a rabid animal is suspected. Other recommendations include a 10-day observation of pets and killing of all wild animals for immediate examination of brain tissue using fluorescent antibodies. Currently, zero-risk animals include cows, pigs, rabbits, rats, squirrels, mice, hamsters, gerbils, and nutria.
Treatment includes passive and active immunization. Cost exceeds $1,500 per case.65 This consists of human rabies immune globulin (HRIG, $750/100 kg dosing) 20 IU/kg, half of the dose infiltrated around the wound and half IM, and human diploid cell vaccine (HDCV, $202/dose) 1 mL IM at a site distant from the immunoglobulin on days 0, 3, 7, 14, and 28.66,67
HIV—Post-exposure prophylaxis
In high-risk source patients (eg, known symptomatic HIV infection, AIDS, acute seroconversion, known high viral load) or exposures (eg, large-bore hollow needle, deep puncture, visible blood on device, needle used in patient's artery or vein), the recommended 2-drug regimen (ie, zidovudine [ZDV] plus lamivudine [3TC]; or 3TC and stavudine [d4T]; or d4T and didanosine [ddI]) should begin within 60 minutes of exposure. If the source is high risk and there was a high-risk exposure, a 3-drug regimen is recommended.68 Other retroviral agents can be substituted for these agents. However, nevirapine is not recommended because of several reported cases of life-threatening hepatotoxicity occurring during prophylaxis. Also give HBIG (0.06 mL/kg IM) for those not vaccinated against hepatitis B.
Mucocutaneous exposures should receive 2 drugs prophylactically in cases involving high-risk source patients or large volumes of blood. Postexposure prophylaxis is not recommended (but may be considered) when the source is unknown or when the source patient's HIV status is unknown.
For questions not answered by this section, the US Department of Health and Human Services has a toll-free 24-hour number available to clinicians for advice on postexposure prophylaxis: (888) 448-4911.
Meningococcus
Administer ciprofloxacin 750 mg once by mouth. Pregnant women and children can receive ceftriaxone 125 mg IM once. One study suggests that azithromycin may be effective for chemoprophylaxis as well.69 For repeated exposures in high-risk occupations, a conjugated tetravalent meningococcal vaccine is available.
Positive tuberculin skin test
See paragraph on tuberculosis in this text for more detail. Isoniazid 300 mg daily for 6 months (or 900 mg twice weekly for 12 mo) reduces lifetime risk of death from TB from over 6% to nearly zero. A recently validated alternative is daily rifampin and pyrazinamide taken for 2 months.70
Keywords
antibiotic therapy, antibiotics in the ED, antibiotics in the emergency department, microbial infections, bacterial infections, treatment of bacterial infections, empiric antibiotic therapy, golden rules of antibiotic use, broad-spectrum antibiotics, antimicrobial therapy, cephalosporins, anaerobic coverage, pseudomonal coverage, antibiotic-resistant gram-positive cocci, MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, gram-negative sepsis, bacterial meningitis, pneumonia, respiratory infections, bronchitis, influenza, sinusitis, otitis media, pharyngitis, urinary tract infections, vaginal infections, sexual assault, bites, wounds, rabies

Acknowledgments
The authors and editors of eMedicine gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous author, Diana Brainard, MD, and Daniel Hayes, PharmD, to the development and writing of this article.

jueves, 25 de marzo de 2010

ID Society Calls for 10 New Antimicrobials by 2020


Emma Hitt, PhD

March 18, 2010 ( UPDATED March 19, 2010 ) — A goal of developing 10 new antibiotics by 2020 has been put forward by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). A statement was published online this week and in the April 15 issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases.
The new goal, known as the 10 × '20 initiative, is designed to bring together various resources to "create a sustainable global antibacterial drug [research and development] enterprise with the power in the short-term to develop 10 new, safe, and effective antibiotics by 2020," according to the statement.
Specially, antimicrobials are needed to treat infections caused to the so-called "ESKAPE" pathogens that currently cause the majority of US hospital infections (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumonia, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species).
According to the IDSA, the decreasing investment in antibacterial drug development, coupled with the increase in antimicrobial resistance, represents an "impending disaster."
"Despite the good faith efforts of many individuals, professional societies, and governmental agencies, the looming crisis has only worsened over the past decade," state the authors from the IDSA Antimicrobial Availability Task Force, led by David Gilbert, MD.
What It Will Take
Dr. Gilbert and colleagues describe the objective as an "audacious" goal. However, Dr. Gilbert explains that "if all of the stakeholders get behind the idea, we certainly have the resources to have 10 new antibacterial drugs in 10 years." He went on to tell Medscape Infectious Diseases that it will take "financial and intellectual investment to get it done."
According to Dr. Gilbert, the goal will require the effort of the scientific community, the legislative branch of the government, and the pharmaceutical industry. He added that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will also need to "adjust their policies such that the traffic pattern through the FDA is smoothly and easily accomplished."
He noted that infectious disease professionals can help by providing support and advocacy in their communities. "Infectious disease consultants are well aware of the need for new antimicrobials," Dr. Gilbert said, "so they should continue to share their anxieties and concerns about the issue."
A Challenging but Not Impossible Goal
"I think that it is possible to meet this goal," said Neil Fishman, MD, president, Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, and director, Healthcare Epidemiology, Infection Prevention and Control, University of Pennsylvania Health System. "We are an imaginative and resourceful society, and we certainly answered a similar challenge in the development of antiretroviral drugs for HIV, so I believe we can respond to this challenge."
However, Marin H. Kollef, MD, professor of medicine in the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, pointed out that "the recent experiences with ceftobiprole, telavancin, and tigecycline indicate that the development of new antimicrobials with approvals from the FDA will be a slow process." "This is partly because agreement on the design of studies for indications such as pneumonia has not been reached between the agency and industry," he told Medscape Infectious Diseases.
According to Dr. Kollef, increasing resistance is certainly a problem, but in addition, the industry has shifted away from antibiotic development because these drugs are "not as profitable as drugs for chronic conditions such as hypertension and diabetes," he said. "Also, the recent lack of approvals for new agents will certainly cause drug makers to rethink any investments in this area."
Clinical Effect of 10 New Drugs
Dr. Kollef noted that the effect of 10 new antimicrobials will depend on their ability to overcome current patterns of resistance. "If they are active against the currently problematic pathogens that are often resistant to currently available drugs, then meeting this goal would have a significant impact," he said, but "this would not be true if they were simply 'me too' drugs."
"New drugs are important for addressing the problem of antimicrobial resistance, but they are not going to be the only answer," said Jean Patel, PhD, deputy director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Office of Antimicrobial Resistance. "It is an important part of addressing the problem," she told Medscape Infectious Diseases, "but we're going to need to continue with prevention and control measures, and it will take both to really address this problem."
Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America President Dr. Fishman concurred that solving the antimicrobial resistance problem will take more than just the development of new antibiotics. "Resistance is a complex problem, and therefore requires multifaceted solutions," he said. "We need antimicrobial stewardship to make certain that new agents are used appropriately or we will see rapid development of resistance," he said. "We also need infection control to prevent transmission of resistant bacteria when they do occur."
Dr. Gilbert, Dr. Fishman, and Dr. Patel have disclosed no relevant financial relationships. Dr. Kollef is a consultant for the speakers bureau of Merck, Pfizer, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bard, Kimberly Clark, Accelr8, and Ortho-McNeil. IDSA's initiative has been endorsed by several health agencies including the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Gastroenterological Association, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

martes, 2 de febrero de 2010

BACTERIAS ANAEROBIAS


Maria Amparo Bravo

Es importante recordar que tanto en las células eucarióticas
(protozoarios, hongos y algas) como en las procarióticas (bacterias, y algas
verde-azules) se llevan a cabo reacciones químicas que incluyen biosíntesis y
transformación de macromoléculas que constituyen gran parte de la masa
celular a partir de compuestos más simples presentes en el entorno
extracelular. Para estos procesos metabólicos se requiere un aporte de
energía, la cual se encuentra en el compuesto altamente reactivo llamado
adenosin-trifosfato, ATP.
El ATP es generado por dos mecanismos bioquímicos:
1.- Fosforilación a nivel del substrato. Uno de los mecanismos más
sencillos generadores de ATP es la fermentación; en este proceso metabólico
compuestos orgánicos sirven tanto de donadores de electrones (oxidándose)
como de receptores (reduciéndose). Los compuestos que realizan éstas dos
funciones son usualmente metabolitos derivados de un único substrato
fermentable tal como un azúcar. Los carbohidratos son los principales
substratos de la fermentación. Entre las bacterias pueden ser fermentados
también otros compuestos como ácidos orgánicos, aminoácidos, purinas y
pirimidinas.
La fosforilación a nivel de substrato es el único modo de síntesis de ATP
a partir del proceso de fermentación.
Pasteur, fue el primero en reconocer el papel fisiológico de la
fermentación, la llamo “ la consecuencia de la vida sin aire”, muchos de los
organismos que generan ATP por fermentación son anaerobios estrictos,
otros son anaerobios facultativos, siendo capaces de desarrollarse tanto en
presencia como en ausencia de aire, generalmente cambian el modo de
generar ATP al quedar expuestos al aire, la presencia de oxígeno molecular
induce un desplazamiento metabólico de la fermentación a la respiración. Las
anaerobias aerotolerantes presentan la excepción a la regla, la presencia de
oxígeno no modifica su metabolismo generador de ATP. La fermentación
continúa aún en presencia de aire.
2.- Transporte de electrones: realizado en la respiración; proceso
metabólico generador de ATP en el que compuestos orgánicos e inorgánicos
sirven como donadores de electrones (oxidándose) y como últimos aceptores
actúan compuestos inorgánicos (reduciéndose). Usualmente el último aceptor
de electrones es el oxígeno molecular.
CLASIFICACION
1.- Teniendo en cuenta la tolerancia al oxigeno las bacterias anaerobias se
clasifican en:
Anaerobias estrictas: Crecen en atmósferas con una tensión de oxígeno
inferior a 0.5%.
Anaerobias aerotolerantes: Toleran el oxígeno hasta un 8% pero son
incapaces de utilizarlo para su metabolismo.
La tolerancia al oxígeno de éstas bacterias está dada por la presencia de
enzimas superoxido dismutasa (SOD), catalasa y peroxidasa que
catalizan la conversión de radicales superoxido a peróxido de hidrógeno
menos tóxico y a oxígeno molecular.
Anaerobios Facultativos: No necesitan oxígeno para su desarrollo normal,
pero si está presente lo pueden utilizar metabolicamente, es decir que crecen
bajo condiciones tanto aeróbicas como anaeróbicas utilizando el oxígeno como
aceptor final de electrones.
Microaerofilicas: Crecen en presencia de tensiones de oxigeno mínimas y lo
metabolizan utilizándolo como aceptor final de electrones. Necesitan atmósfera
de CO2.
2.- Teniendo en cuenta la morfología y Tincion de Gram:
Se clasifican en cocos, bacilos, Cocobacilos y fusobacterias. Gram positivas y
Gram negativas.
3.- La presencia o no de esporas los clasifica en esporulados y no esporulados.
FUENTES DE INFECCION
Las Bacterias anaerobias están ampliamente distribuidas en la naturaleza.
Podemos diferenciar dos clases de fuentes:
* FUENTES EXOGENAS:
- El suelo.
- El agua: Lagos, sedimento de ríos, océanos, aguas cloacales.
- Alimentos.
- Tracto gastrointestinal de animales.
* FUENTES ENDOGENAS: Cuando se encuentran en el ser humano formando
parte de la flora normal en piel y mucosas. En algunos lugares superan a los
aerobios en una proporción de 1:1000. Las fuentes más importantes son:
o CAVIDAD ORAL
En la boca existe una flora polimicrobiana muy compleja ligada a la variabilidad
de las condiciones existentes en el interior de la misma como son:
1.-El potencial redox (Eh) en los diferentes espacios como pliegues bucales,
superficie de la lengua, surcos gingivales, espacios periodontales.
2.- Presencia de cálculo y placa bacteriana: Entre más antigua es la placa
mejores son las condiciones de anaerobiosis.
3.- Edad: A los pocos días del nacimiento hay temprana implantación de
Lactobacilos y Streptococcus, posteriormente Staphylococcus y Veillonelas. A
los 6 meses de edad encontramos Actinomyces, Nocardias, Fusobacterias.
Podemos mencionar como anaerobios componentes de la flora normal de
cavidad oral y Tracto Respiratorio Superior los siguientes géneros:
o TRACTO RESPIRATORIO SUPERIOR
NASOFARINGE: Son géneros encontrados con mayor frecuencia:
Peptostreptococcus
Veillonella
Propionibacterium
Clostridium
Actinomyces
Eubacterium
Prevotella
Bacteroides
Fusobacterium

o OJOS: A nivel de conjuntiva y conductos lacrimales existen factores de
Protección que realizan el control de la flora como son las lágrimas y la
lisozima. Los géneros de anaerobios encontrados con mayor frecuencia son:
Propionibacterium
Clostridium

o TRACTO GENITO URINARIO
URETRA: La uretra solo está colonizada por microorganismos en la parte más
próxima al peiné.La flora normal es parte de la flora que coloniza la piel que la
recubre. Bacteroides frágilis, Propionibacterium s.p, Peptostreptococcus,
Peptococcus, Lactobacillus, Clostridium, Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Veillonella.
VAGINA: La flora vaginal tiene variaciones de acuerdo a la edad, al nacer
predominan los lactobacilos aerobios. Posteriormente el pH se torna neutro por
lo cual la flora predominante es mixta (cocos y bacilos) hasta la pubertad,
época en la cual el pH se torna nuevamente ácido y hay protección,
predominan los lactobacilos aerobios y anaerobios. El moco cervical también
es un factor de protección porque contiene la lisozima. En el periodo de la
menopausia cambia el pH y predomina nuevamente una flora mixta.
La flora normal vaginal incluye: Bacteroides frágilis, Propionibacterium s.p,
Peptostreptococcus, Peptococcus, Lactobacillus, Clostridium, Prevotella,
Fusobacterium, Veillonella.
o PIEL: A nivel de piel el pH ácido, los ácidos grasos de las secreciones
Sebáceas y la presencia de lisozima son factores de protección.Los géneros
de anaerobios que se encuentran con mayor frecuencia Son:
Clostridium, Propionibacterium, Peptostreptococcus.
o TRACTO GASTROINTESTINAL
Existen factores que influyen en el tipo de flora a nivel del tracto gastrointestinal
Estos son: La flora normal de oro faringe y boca y la presencia de alimentos.
Por lo anterior encontramos una flora residente y una flora transitoria.
La concentración bacteriana varía de acuerdo a las condiciones de pH y a las
funciones de cada una de las partes que conforman el tracto.
Entre más avanzamos en el trayecto del TGI mayor concentración de bacterias
encontramos.Asi a nivel gástrico después de comida podemos encontrar
concentraciones de 10 2 -10 3 bac/ml. Es una flora pasajera pues el pH ácido
no permite sino la permanencia de algunos microorganismos que toleran el
medio.
A nivel de duodeno y yeyuno las concentraciones son de 10 3 -10 4 bac/ml.
A nivel de Ileon 10 7 bac/gr.
A nivel de Ciego 10 9 bac/gr.
A nivel de heces 10 11 bac/gr.
La flora normal intestinal cumple funciones benéficas como:
* Producción de vitamina K
* Transformación de pigmentos biliares en ac. Biliares.
* Contribuyen en la absorción y metabolismo primario de numerosos nutrientes.
* Antagonismo para microorganismos patógenos.
INTESTINO DELGADO: Son géneros de anaerobios encontrados con mayor
frecuencia en duodeno y yeyuno: Peptostreptococcus. Peptococcus,
Lactobacillus.
INTESTINO GRUESO: ileon – colon: Bacteroides frágilis, Prevotella,
Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Peptococcus, Lactobacillus.
FACTORES DE VIRULENCIA DE BACTERIAS ANAEROBIAS
CAPSULA: Compuesta de polisacáridos. Posee características heterogéneas
según las diferentes especies a modo de glicocálix en unas especies, a manera
de capa gruesa en otras (cápsula).
Inhibe la acción bactericida mediada por el complemento por lo cual los
microorganismos resisten la opzonización y la fagocitosis.
Tiene propiedades de quimiotactismo lo que explica la capacidad del
microorganismo de formar abscesos.
Favorece la adherencia.
PRODUCCION DE ENZIMAS: Estas modifican el ambiente local favoreciendo
la proliferación del microorganismo y la destrucción tisular.Ej: Heparinasa,
colagenasa, hialuronidasa, fibrinolisina, neuraminidasa, Dnasa.
CAPACIDAD DE ADHERENCIA: Mecanismo por el cual se adhieren al epitelio
por diferentes mecanismos e inician su proceso de patogenicidad.
PRODUCCION DE ACIDO SUCCINICO: Mecanismo se favorece la
destrucción celular.
FIMBRIAS: Las fimbrias son estructuras que forman parte del soma bacteriano.
En las especies que las poseen está relacionada con la adherencia
inespecífica de bacterias Gram negativas a las superficies de la mucosa.
Su composición es de naturaleza proteica. Su tamaño varía en cada especie.
En Bacteroides frágilis se han demostrado fimbrias largas compuestas por
fimbrilina. En Porphyromonas gingivalis son mas cortas y finas.
PROTEINAS DE PARED: Proteínas que realizan funciones de adherencia
celular, facilitan el reconocimiento de superficies, actúan como capa protectora.
Se han observado porinas, proteinas S, proteína L (en Peptostreptococcus) y
poseen la propiedad de unirse inespecíficamente a Igs facilitando la invasión de
mucosas. También se han observado proteínas en Bacteroides, Prevotella,
Eubacterium.
LIPOPOLISACARIDO: El lipopolisacárido (LPS) de bacterias anaerobias Gram
negativas posee menos actividad endotóxica que el de las Enterobacterias.El
LPS Tiene relación con la inducción de fiebre, estimula a las células B
policlonales e inducen la producción de citoquinas por los macrófagos.El LPS
del Fusobacterium y Bacteroides mueven el complemento por la vía clásica y
más aún por la vía alterna, generando C5c que actúa como quimiotáctico para
PMN.
SINERGISMO: Los microorganismos anaerobios pueden actuar como
patógenos directos o sinérgicamente con la flora aerobia para dar lugar al
proceso infeccioso. Las bacterias aerobias asociadas consumen oxígeno y
producen gas contribuyendo a descender el Eh; preparando el medio para el
desarrollo de los anaerobios. Por otra parte las bacterias aerobias producen
metabolitos como Vit K requerida por algunos anaerobios.
PRODUCCION DE BETALACTAMASAS: Factor indirecto de patogenicidad,
provocando la inactivación de betalactámicos. La asociación de comensales
productores de betalatamasas en el área de infección permite que los
patógenos sensibles a los betalactámicos queden cubiertos por estos
antimicrobianos dificultando el éxito de la terapia.
FACTORES PREDISPONENTES DE INFECCION POR
ANAEROBIOS
Factores dependientes del huésped, influyen directamente sobre la formación
del proceso infeccioso por el cual un microorganismo incluso comensal puede
invadir tejidos y ser responsable de la infección. Pueden ser:
- Alteraciones del sistema del complemento.
- Alteraciones en la acción de los macrófagos.
- Alteraciones en la integridad de las barreras mucosas
- En edades extremas se presentan alteraciones de la deglución y alteraciones
en el sistema inmune.
- Desnutrición
- Alcoholismo
- Traumas
- Mordeduras
- Inmunosupresión.
- Tromboflebitis
- Arteriosclerosis
- Terapia antimicrobiana
- Diabetes
FISIOPATOLOGIA DE INFECCION POR ANAEROBIOS
Las infecciones causadas por bacterias anaerobias son generalmente
polimicrobianas (Anaerobios, anaerobios facultativos, aerobios)
Las superficies intactas del cuerpo impiden que los anaerobios comensales
penetren a tejidos sanos en número significativo.Cuando esto ocurre las
condiciones normales y el alto potencial Eh inhiben la multiplicación.
Cuando la integridad de piel y mucosas se pierde, los tejidos se lesionan o hay
necrosis que reduce el potencial Eh, los anaerobios encuentran las condiciones
propicias para proliferar e iniciar un proceso infeccioso.
La infección se produce cuando los anaerobios y otras bacterias de la flora
normal contaminan sitios del organismo normalmente estériles.Exepto cuando
se adquieren de fuentes exógenas como por ejemplo infecciones por
Clostridium tetani, botulinum entre otros.
Las manifestaciones clínicas y los síndromes dependen del órgano afectado y
de las condiciones particulares de cada paciente.
SIGNOS CLINICOS CARACTERISTICOS
- Exudado maloliente característico. (Se produce por productos del
metabolismo anaerobio de los ac. Grasos de cadena corta)
- Localización de la infección en lugares próximos a mucosas.
- Necrosis tisular.
- Abscesos.
- Gas en tejidos. (Co, H2)
- Infecciones pos mordeduras.
- Existencia de tromboflebitis séptica.
- Gránulos de azufre en la secreción (Actinomicosis)
- Heridas penetrantes en abdomen y pelvis.
- Infecciones posteriores a cirugía de TGI o TGU.
- Abortos sépticos.
- Cuadros típicos como Gangrena Gaseosa.
SINDROMES CLINICOS
1.-SISTEMA NERVIOSO CENTRAL
MENINGITIS POR BACTERIAS ANAEROBIAS
No es frecuente. En caso de que se presente los hallazgos en el LCR son los
característicos de cualquier otra meningitis bacteriana. Turbidez, pleocitosis
con predominio de PMN o de mononucleares, aumento de proteínas y glucosa
baja.
MICROORGANISMOS MAS FRECUENTES: Cocos Gram positivos
anaerobios, Bacteroides sp, Fusobacterium sp, Clostridium sp, Actinomyces sp,
Propionibacterium sp.
ABSCESO CEREBRAL
Con frecuencia es polimicrobiano pudiéndose encontrar una o más especies.
MICROORGANISMOS MAS FRECUENTES: Peptostreptococcussp,
Bacteroides sp, Actinomyces, Veillonella sp, Fusobacterium sp.
EMPIEMA SUBDURAL
Colección de pus localizada en el espacio potencial entre aracnoides y
duramadre.
MICROORGANISMOS MAS FRECUENTES. Streptococcus anaerobio,
Bacteroides, Fusobacterias, Actinomyces.
ABSCESO EPIDURAL
Entre duramadre, periostio y ligamentos que conforman el canal espinal.Este
espacio virtual es entre vértebras dorsales, lumbares y sacras.
Se puede infectar por: vía hematógena, a partir de osteomielitis vertebral,
implantación de catéteres, cirugías, herida penetrante, ulceras de decúbito,
absceso paraespinal.
MICROORGANISMOS MAS FRECUENTES: Streptococcus anaerobios,
actinomices israelíi (ocasionalmente), Bacilos Gram negativos anaerobios

2.- INFECCIONES PERIODONTALES
Las más frecuentes son la gingivitis y periodontitis según se localicen en
encía o invadan estructuras más profundas del sistema periodontal.
Factores predisponentes: Placa dental y mala higiene oral.
A partir de la formación de la placa del diente que diseca la unión virtual de
encías a superficie dentaria se produce una bolsa con condiciones de bajo
potencial redox, facilitando el crecimiento de anaerobios, provocando formación
de abscesos y diseminación bacteriana.
MICROORGANISMOS MAS FRECUENTES: Peptostreptococcus sp,
,Actinomyces sp,Lactobacillussp,Eubacterium sp,Actinobacillus
actinomycetencomitans,Eikenella corrodens,Capnocitophaga,
Veillonellasp,Bacteroides sp,Fusobacterium sp.
En embarazo aumentan los niveles hormonales por lo cual hay exacerbación
de algunas especies como Bacteroides pigmentados, Aumentando la incidencia
de infecciones gingivales, aumentando las caries y afección de piezas
dentarias.
ABSCESO PERIODONTAL
Infección mixta, en su mayor porcentaje por Bacilos Gram negativos
anaerobios como: Porphyromonas, Fusobacterias, Prevotella. Como Gram
positivos tenemos Peptococcus, Peptostreptococcus, Capnocytophaga.
3.-TRACTO RESPIRATORIO
Los microorganismos anaerobios que forman parte de la flora orofaringea
normal en determinadas situaciones pueden invadir el aparato respiratorio y
producir neumonía, con posible necrosis del parenquima pulmonar (absceso) y
extensión a la pleura (empiema)
La mayoría de infecciones por anaerobios son consecuencia de la aspiración
de secreciones orofaringeas.En condiciones normales el reflejo de cierre de la
glotis, los mecanismos de aclaramiento de las vías respiratorias (tos y
transporte muco ciliar) y el alto potencial de oxido reducción de los tejidos
evitan la invasión del parenquima pulmonar y la infección posterior por
microorganismos anaerobios de la flora orofaringea. Cuando el volumen del
aspirado es muy grande, la densidad de gérmenes muy alta o el potencial de
Eh en tejidos disminuye por debajo de 100mV, este proceso se ve alterado
pudiéndose presentar ABSCESOS PULMONARES, NEUMONIA
NECROTIZANTE, EMPIEMA entre otros.
MICROORGANISMOS MAS FRECUENTES: Prevotella sp, Fusobacterium sp,
Peptostreptococcus sp,
Con menor frecuencia se pueden encontrar
microorganismos anaerobios de la flora oro faríngea.
4.-INFECCIONES INTRA-ABDOMINALES
Pueden presentarse como complicación en enfermedades de tratamiento
médico inicial (Peritonitis primaria bacteriana, pancreatitis aguda.)
En procesos quirúrgicos que evolucionan hacia una peritonitis (apendicitis
aguda, perforación de un ulcus peptico) o como complicación postoperatoria
tras cirugía abdominal.
El contacto de bacterias con el peritoneo, produce una reacción inflamatoria
inmediata con un componente local y uno sistémico.
A nivel local se produce una reacción vascular con un aumento en la capacidad
de absorción peritoneal y aumento de la permeabilidad vascular, esto conlleva
a la salida del torrente vascular de proteínas (reactantes de fase aguda),
fibrinógeno que comienza a formar mallas pretendiendo limitar el proceso
mediante la formación de adherencias. Por otra parte se produce marginación
de elementos formes, especialmente neutrofilos que comienzan a fagocitar
bacterias y células cebadas que producen histamina y aumentan la
permeabilidad vascular.
Cuando se limita el proceso por ésta reacción se producirá una peritonitis
localizada o absceso intra -abdominal, si no se produce ésta limitación se
genera la peritonitis difusa.
Una característica propia de infecciones intra-abdominales es la de ser
difásicas. En primera instancia predominan las bacterias aerobias que una vez
se ha disminuido la tensión de oxígeno se lleva a cabo la proliferación de la
flora anaerobia.
INFECCION DE VIAS BILIARES
La alteración de vías biliares conlleva a la disfunción de la ampolla de water y
a cambios fisiológicos en el duodeno y en el peristaltismo intestinal, esto
produce una modificación ecológica del intestino aumentando la flora anaerobia
en tractos altos. Se colonizan las vías biliares por anaerobios que actúan en el
epitelio lesionado químicamente y se produce la infección biliar.
5.- INFECCIONES GINECOLOGICAS
VAGINOSIS BACTERIANA
Trastorno polimicrobiano producido por el cambio del pH ácido de la vagina y
de la concentración de Lacto bacilos lo cual hace que se eleve la concentración
de otros microorganismos especialmente anaerobios

MICROORGANISMOS MAS FRECUENTES: Gardnerella vaginalis, Mobiluncus
Bacteroides, Peptostreptococcus.
ENDOMETRITIS POSTPARTO
Existen dos factores importantes en la patogenia de éstas infecciones:
- Es necesario que los microorganismos patógenos alcancen una
concentración crítica.
- La diseminación de las bacterias en la cavidad abdominal aumenta el riesgo
de infección.
Durante el parto, el líquido amniótico se contamina con bacterias después de la
ruptura de membranas, las cuales representan la fuente más común de
infección postparto.El líquido contiene sustancias que tienen poder
antibacteriano por lo tanto tienen que haber condiciones que favorecen la
infección como son: Parto prolongado, cesárea, ruptura prematura de
membranas, elevado número de exámenes pélvicos, presencia de anemia.
MICROORGANISMOS ANAEROBIOS MAS FRECUENTES: Es una entidad
polimicrobiana se encuentran bacterias aerobias y anaerobios como:
Bacteroides sp, Fusobacterium sp, Peptococcus sp, Peptostreptococcus sp.
SEPSIS POSTABORTO
Los servicios de personal no médico para interrumpir la gestación, las
condiciones de higiene en que se realizan las maniobras, la presencia de
productos de concepción retenidos, la existencia de cualquier traumatismo
uterino y la vaginosis bacteriana previa son factores condicionantes en la
patología del aborto séptico
MICROORGANISMOS IMPLICADOS: Los anaerobios presentes en vagina y
cervix.
ENFERMEDAD PELVICA INFLAMATORIA
Infección de la parte superior del tracto genital: Endometrio (endometritis),
trompas (salpingitis), ovario (ooforitis), pared uterina (miometritis) o porciones
del peritoneo parietal (peritonitis).
Factores de riesgo: ETS, presencia de DIU, Irrigaciones vaginales.
MICROORGANISMOS ANAEROBIOS MAS FRECUENTES: Bacteroides sp,
Peptostreptococcus sp,
6.- PIEL Y TEJIDOS BLANDOS Y OSTEOARTICULARES
ULCERAS CUTÁNEAS
La infección suele ser mixta, microorganismos procedentes de flora fecal y
urinaria. Los anaerobios más frecuentes: Bacteroides sp, Porphyromonas sp,
peptococcus sp, y Peptostreptococcus sp.
ABSCESOS
La presencia de bacterias provoca atracción de PMN y macrófagos. Una vez
se destruyen las células por los microorganismos se liberan enzimas.Las
bacterias se multiplican y pasan de fase logarítmica a estacionaria, consumen
el oxígeno creando un ambiente anaerobio que impide la acción normal de
PMN.
Los PMN parasitados viran su ambiente a ph ácido que al romperse cambian el
ph del exudado.
Algunos antimicrobianos actúan con dificultad a ph ácido. La acción de los
betalactámicos en fase estacionaria es escasa.
El antibiótico no resuelve el absceso y debe drenarse quirúrgicamente.
MICROORGANISMOS MAS FRECUENTES: Peptostreptococcus sp
Bacteroides sp, Prevotella sp.
PIE DIABETICO
Los problemas vasculares y nerviosos junto a alteraciones defensivas e
higiénicas conducen al desarrollo de úlceras infectadas.
MICROORGANISMOS ANAEROBIOS MAS FRECUENTES:
Peptostreptococcus sp, Bacteroides sp, Clostridium sp.
MIONECROSIS
Infección muy grave, con alto índice de mortalidad.
Se caracteriza por aparición súbito de dolor en una herida previa, edema
frialdad, palidez con áreas de color bronce, bullas hemorrágicas, necrosis y un
cuadro de toxemia.
MICROORGANISMOS MAS FRECUENTES: Clostridium perfringens, C. novi,
C. sépticum, C. histolíticum.
CELULITIS ANAEROBIA
Se localiza en tejidos epifasciales, puede evolucionar con grandes necrosis.
Las manifestaciones sistémicas son raras. Se puede presentar dolor, edema,
eritema, hipersensibilidad y crepitación, supuración maloliente.
Anaerobios más frecuentes: Clostridium sp, Peptostreptococcus, Bacteroides
sp, Prevotella sp.
DIAGNOSTICO MICROBIOLOGICO DE INFECCION POR
ANAEROBIOS
El diagnóstico microbiológico de infecciones por anaeróbios se realiza
mediante cultivos en anaerobiosis, los cuales nos permiten recuperar
el microorganismo y confirmar el diagnóstico clínico de la infección.
MUESTRAS ADECUADAS PARA EL PROCESAMIENTO:
Se consideran muestras inadecuadas las que provienen de las superficies
mucosas ya que es difícil diferenciar si el agente causal aislado es un
comensal o el germen infeccioso.
Muestras de sitios que no albergan flora normal, obtenidas por aspiración son
adecuadas para cultivar en anaerobiosis.
TOMA DE MUESTRAS
Para obtener unos resultados satisfactorios, es indispensable una buena
Selección, y recolección de la muestra. Un transporte rápido, evita que las
bacterias esten expuestas al oxígeno.
Es de particular importancia realizar una perfecta decontaminación de piel con
jabón quirúrgico y solución desinfectante como alcohol o compuestos yodados,
para eliminar la flora normal.
La toma de la muestra debe hacerse con jeringa, los hisopados no se
recomiendan por la exposición del espécimen al aire y porque son más
susceptibles a contaminación con bacterias de la flora normal.
Una vez tomada la muestra debe evitarse la exposición al oxígeno tapando el
extremo de la aguja con un tapón de caucho después de eliminar el aire si éste
ha pasado a la jeringa.
Transportar al laboratorio en el menor tiempo posible, existen factores que
pueden modificar la composición bacteriana inicial tales como temperatura, o
humedad, El tiempo no debe exceder de 20 minutos.
Las muestras no se deben guardar o transportar refrigeradas porque en el frío
el oxígeno se difunde más rápidamente.
En caso de tener acceso a medios de transporte debe realizarse en un medio
específico para bacterias anaerobias y deben tener atmósfera anaerobia.
SISTEMAS DE INCUBACION ANAEROBIA
􀃍 Jarra anaeróbica: Recipiente de cierre hermético, en el que se elimina
el oxígeno por diferentes medios (sobres generadores de gases como
hidrógeno, nitrógeno y CO2 que desplazan el oxígeno y crean un
ambiente anaerobio), incluyen un catalizador y un indicador de
anaerobiosis.
􀃍 Cámara de anaerobiosis: Cabina herméticamente cerrada de plástico,
metal, fibra de vidrio o polivinilo, con un sistema de intercambio, dos
puertas interna y externa y que puede llenarse de gas libre de oxígeno,
lleva además soportes con guantes incorporados para realizar
manipulación de muestras en el interior.
􀃍 Bolsas de anaerobiosis: Bolsas de plástico transparente.Usan también
sobres generadores de gases proporcionales a su tamaño e indicadores
de anaerobiosis.
MEDIOS DE CULTIVO
Se utilizan medios selectivos, no selectivos y de enriquecimiento.Los
medios de cultivo para anaerobios tienen una alta proporción de peptonas
e hidratos de carbono ya que su metabolismo es más exigente que el de
bacterias facultativas y requieren además factores de crecimiento como la
hemina y vitamina K.
Los medios empleados con mayor frecuencia son:
- AGAR SANGRE ANAEROBIO (ASA): Agar sangre complementado con
Vitamina K y hemina Medio no
selectivo. Crecen anaerobios y anaerobios facultativos.
- AGAR SANGRE LACADA KANAMICINA VANCOMICINA (ASLKV):
Medio selectivo para bacilos Gram negativos anaerobios, favorece
producción de pigmento.
- FENILETIL ALCOHOL AGAR (FEA): Inhibe el crecimiento de bacilos
Gram negativos aerobios facultativos.Crecen la mayor parte de anaerobios
Gram positivos y Gram negativos, el alcohol sirve como aceptor final de
electrones.
AGAR BACTEROIDES BILIS ESCULINA (BBE): Selectivo para
Bacteroides sobre todo grupo frágilis, pueden crecer también fusobacterium.
- AGAR YEMA DE HUEVO (EYA): Para Clostridium sp.
- AGAR CICLOSERINA CEFOXITINA FRUCTOSA (CCFA): Para
Clostridium difficile.
- AGAR CHOCOLATE: Contiene hemina.
- CALDO TIOGLICOLATO
- CALDO GLUCOSA CON CARNE: Suplementado con vit k y hemina
- CALDO INFUSION CEREBRO CORAZON
INCUBACION
La mayoría de los casos se incuban a una temperatura de 35 a 37 ºC.
El tiempo de incubación debe ser de 72 a 96 horas ya que estos
microorganismos a diferencia de los aerobios son de crecimiento lento.
Se debe evitar la exposición al aire.
IDENTIFICACION DE BACTERIAS ANAEROBIAS
Una vez ingresa la muestra al laboratorio, se procede a confirmar datos de
identificación como: Nombre y apellidos del paciente, Nº de historia clínica,
Fecha y hora de toma de la muestra, servicio donde está hospitalizado, Nº de
cama.
TINCION DE GRAM : Se deben observar características morfológicas y de
Tinción que son sugestivos de las bacterias anaerobias:
Bacilos Gram negativos decolorados o mal teñidos.
Es importante observar la forma, el tamaño y la disposición de las bacterias,
número relativo de microorganismos presentes, presencia de esporos, rasgos
morfológicos como ramificación.filamentos, cuerpos esféricos, extremos en
punta y formas granulares.
La presencia y cantidad de leucocitos PMN (reacción leucocitaria) y de células
epiteliales.
INOCULACIÓN EN MEDIOS DE CULTIVO: Antes de realizar la inoculación se
deben tener en cuenta aspectos
como:
* Tipo de muestra (líquidos, tejidos, secreciones) para aplicar los protocolos
respectivos.
* Sistema anaeróbico que se va a usar: Cuando no se trabaja en cámara
anaeróbica se debe tener agilidad en la realización del procedimiento porque la
presencia del oxígeno del aire ocasiona pérdida de gran número de bacterias.
* Técnica de aislamiento adecuada.
La inoculación inicial se realiza en medios de inoculación primaria. Sólidos y
líquidos.
Se realiza atmósfera anaeróbica y se incuban 35-37 ºC durante 24 a 96 horas.
En éste lapso de tiempo se realiza observación directa diaria, buscando la
presencia de crecimiento bacteriano; colonias en medios sólidos o turbidez y
cambios de color en medios líquidos.
Una vez se presenta crecimiento de colonias se debe observar sus
características como tamaño, color, superficie, consistencia.Se realizan
tinciones de Gram a las colonias aisladas.
PRUEBA DE AEROTOLERANCIA: Se realiza a toda colonia que haya crecido
en ambiente anaeróbico.
Consiste en transferir cada colonia de la placa de aislamiento anaerobio a una
placa de agar sangre aerobio, incubándose de 12 a18 horas con atmósfera de
CO2 del 5 al 10% en aerobiosis.
El crecimiento o no del microorganismo en aerobiosis nos hace la diferencia
entre un anaerobio estricto o un anaerobio facultativo.
FASES DE IDENTIFICACION
Existen diferentes métodos de identificación de bacterias anaerobias.
Se pueden diferenciar tres fases de identificación de bacterias anaerobias, de
acuerdo al nivel de complejidad y a los recursos del laboratorio donde se
realiza.
FASE I: Se relaciona con la morfología y tinción; se realiza mediante la Tinción
de Gram.
FASE II: Identificación de género mediante:
1.- Pruebas de sensibilidad a antimicrobianos: se realizan con discos de papel
de filtro impregnados con antimicrobianos (sensidiscos) como kanamicina,
colistina, vancomicina. La lectura se realiza a las 24-48 horas de incubación
siendo sensible cuando el halo de inhibición es igual o mayor de 10mm de
diámetro.
2.- Pruebas bioquímicas: Una vez se obtiene un cultivo puro del
microorganismo se pueden realizar pruebas bioquímicas de acuerdo al tipo de
microorganismo según sea Gram positivo o Gram negativo. Ejemplo catalasa,
indol, nitratos, urea, lecitinasa, lipasa.
FASE III: Para identificación definitiva de anaerobios la cual incluye genero y
especie. Requiere además de las pruebas utilizadas en el nivel II, una serie de
métodos adicionales. Y pruebas sofisticadas como la cromatografía liquido-gas.
Existen también sistemas enzimáticos rápidos como RapID-ANA II, MicroScan,
o ANI Card (Vitek).Para utilizar éstos sistemas es necesario tener un
aislamiento del microorganismo en cultivo puro.
GENERO CLOSTRIDIUM
Las Bacterias del género Clostridium son bacilos Gram positivos esporulados,
la mayor parte de sus especies son anaerobios estrictos .Su hábitat es el medio
ambiente, el suelo y el tracto gastrointestinal del hombre y animales.Las
esporas los hacen muy resistentes a los factores externos como calor,
humedad, desecación,desinfectantes.
MORFOLOGIA: Pueden observarse como bacilos largos, estrechos,
Pleomorficos a veces de formas filamentosas de gran
longitud.Forman esporas que pueden situarse en la región terminal,
subterminal o central de acuerdo a la especie.
Algunos son móviles poseen flagelos perítricos, otros son capsulados como el
Clostridium perfringens.
METABOLISMO: Carecen de citocromos necesarios para el transporte de
electrones, de catalasas y peroxidasas.
La mayoría producen grandes cantidades de gas (CO2 e H) por fermentación
butírica.Fermentan varios azúcares lo que permite la diferenciación de especies
junto con reacciones bioquímicas como: Liquefacción de la gelatina, reducción
de nitratos, producción de indol a partir de triptófano.
Existen especies proteoliticas y otras sacarolíticas.
FACTORES DE PATOGENICIDAD:
Poseen enzimas como colagenasa
Proteinasas, hialuronidasas, desoxirribonucleasa, lecitinasa y neuraminidasa
las cuales actúan a nivel local produciendo destrucción de tejidos, algunas de
éstas actúan como toxinas en el huésped.
Toxinas: Proteínas que elabora el microorganismo y llegan a ser potentes
exotoxinas que actúan a nivel de órganos y sistemas ,como la toxina tetánica y
botulínica, cuya potencia se halla relacionada con su afinidad por el sistema
nervioso central y sus acciones farmacológicas están relacionadas con el
bloqueo de la liberación de acetilcolina en las terminaciones nerviosas.
Pueden diferenciarse varias clases según el tropismo del microorganismo:
Neurotoxinas, enterotoxinas, hemolisinas, histotoxinas.
Las esporas, Altamente resistentes al calor y a los desinfectantes sobreviven
durante largos periodos de tiempo expuestas al aire, germinan cuando
encuentran las condiciones necesarias de oxido-reducción.
Poseen antígenos flagelares (H) termo lábiles y antígenos somáticos (O)
lipopolisacáridos que son termo estables.
ESPECIES CLINICAMENTE IMPORTANTES
- Clostridium tetani. Produce el tétano
- Clostridium botulinum produce botulismo, botulismo infantil, botulismo de
heridas.
- Clostridium perfringens. Produce intoxicación alimentaria, mionecrosis,
celulitis anaerobica, colitis necrotizante.
- Clostridium difficile. Produce colitis pseudomembranosa.
GENERO BACTEROIDES
Bacilos Gram negativos pequeños de extremos redondeados, poseen largas
vacuolas, contienen esfingolípidos en la membrana .Algunos poseen enzima
súper oxido dismutasa (SOD) y otras proteínas inducidas por el oxígeno.
Anaerobios aerotolerantes, no forman esporas, son inmóviles.
Forman parte de la flora normal del TGI, está común mente en íleon terminal y
prolifera en colon en proporciones de 10 9 microorganismos/gr.También se
puede encontrar en boca, vagina y uretra.
METABOLISMO: Producen un conjunto de ácidos succínico, láctico, acético,
Fórmico y propiónico y algunos de ellos una mezcla de
ac.acético y butírico, como productos de la fermentación de la glucosa.
FACTORES DE PATOGENICIDAD:
- Cápsula compuesta de polisacáridos A y B, la cual puede conferir resistencia
para mecanismos de defensa del huésped.Los antígenos capsulares pueden
causar más una respuesta de células T que una mediada por anticuerpos.
Puede estimular los depósitos de fibrina e inducir la formación de abscesos.
- Degrada el complemento del huésped por factores no identificados.
- Produce enzimas como neuraminidasa, hialuronidasa, Dnasa, fosfatasa y
muy ocasionalmente fibrinolisinas.
- Produce heparinasa que puede predisponer a trombosis vascular.
- Produce Zinc metalo proteasas (Entero toxina).
ESPECIES CLINICAMENTE IMPORTANTES:
Bacteroides frágilis.
Bacteroides melaninogénicus
.
PATOGENIA
Los Bacteroides son microorganismos comensales no invasores, pero en
ciertas circunstancias, pueden producir infecciones graves y mortales se ha
reportado hasta un 60% de mortalidad. Infecta cualquier sitio del organismo.
Producen secreción purulenta y suelen producir gases en el interior de los
tejidos. Los factores predisponentes de mayor frecuencia son los traumas
quirúrgicos o accidentales, edema, anoxia y destrucción de tejidos, en éstas
circunstancias, pueden invadir los tejidos multiplicándose rápidamente.
Con frecuencia pueden producir abscesos.
Beneficios:
- Estos microorganismos producen ac. Acético, butírico y propiónico
Proporcionando el 70% de la energía a los entericitos colonicos.
- Juegan un papel clave en la recirculación de ac. Biliares entero hepáticos y en
la biotransformación de ácidos biliares.
- Compite por los substratos con microorganismos patógenos.
- Produce algo de vit K.
DIAGNOSTICO MICROBIOLÓGICO
* Toma de muestra por aspiración.
* Cultivo para anaerobios.
BIBLIOGRAFIA
- Jawetz, Ernest. Microbiología médica. 17ª. ed. Editorial Appleton and Larg.
2002
- Mims, Cedric A. Microbiología médica. Editorial Mosby/doyma, 1995.
- Murray, Patgrick R. Microbiología médica, 2da ed. Editorial Harcourt Brace,
España, 1.997
- Sherris, John C. Microbiología médica: Introducción a las Enfermedades
Infecciosas. Editorial Mosby/Doyma, 1993
- Zinsser, H. Zinsser Microbiología, 20 ed. Editorial Panamericana, 1995
- Mandell, Gerald. Enfermedades Infecciosas. Principios y práctica, Vol., 2. ed.
Editorial. médica Panamericana, 1997
- Schaechter, Moselio. Microbiología. Mecanismos de las Enfermedades
Infecciosas. Estudio y enfoque mediante resolución de problemas. 2ª ed.
Editorial Panamericana.
- Koneman, Elmer. Diagnostico microbiológico Texto y Atlas color. 5ª. Editorial
Panamericana, 1999
- Muñoz, Agredo Julio. Infecciones por Anaerobios. RMNS.4589/90
Barcelona1993.

martes, 19 de enero de 2010

2009-2010 H1N1: What's New This Week -- January 4, 2010

Commentary by John G. Bartlett, MD

H1N1 and Vaccine Update
Influenza-like illnesses (ILIs) accounted for 3.2% of outpatient visits during week 51 that ended December 26. This is an increase from 2.3% a week ago.
All influenza A isolates during the week of December 20-26 were 2009 influenza A (H1N1). Analysis of recent strains showed that 99.7% are related to the H1N1 vaccine strain.
Vaccine for 2009 influenza A is now readily available in most places in the United States. The total number of doses available as of December 30, 2009 was 118 million doses. About half of the states now offer this vaccine to people who are not in the high-risk groups, and many states are now using pharmacies to facilitate distribution.
Resistance tests completed on 2445 strains of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) found that 38 (1.6%) were resistant to oseltamivir; 34 of 36 patients with resistant strains were from patients with documented exposure to oseltamivir.
The total number of pediatric deaths attributed to 2009 influenza A (H1N1) since August 20, 2009 is 225. Reviews of 106 of these cases indicate bacterial superinfection in 35 (33%) patients, including Streptococcus pneumoniae in 10 patients and Staphylococcus aureus in 10 patients.
Commentary. What does this mean for practitioners?
The second wave of H1N1 is resolving, although the total ILI reports for week 51 were higher than for week 50: Nationally we are nearly back to baseline rates of ILI.
There is now plenty of 2009 influenza A vaccine: In fact, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has launched a big promotional campaign to encourage vaccination.
What will happen in January-March 2010 when seasonal flu usually hits? No one knows, but there are 3 possibilities: (1) seasonal flu will circulate as usual, with influenza A (H1N1 and H3N2) plus influenza B; (2) seasonal flu will occur with the pandemic 2009 influenza (H1N1) strain predominating; or (3) no flu will occur. Of note, seasonal flu strains are not evolving much in the world. Thomas Freiden, MD, MPH, Director of the CDC, asked 12 world influenza experts to predict what is going to happen with regard to influenza. Half of the experts said that there would be a third wave of pandemic (H1N1) flu, and half claimed that there would not be a third wave. In the southern hemisphere where the winter season ended in September, the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) strain "pushed out seasonal flu," and thus far Europe and the United States are almost exclusively finding the pandemic strain. In previous influenza pandemics (1918, 1957, and 1968) the pandemic strain also dominated in flu season. However, no one is confident enough to predict what will happen, in large part because the influenza virus continues to defy predictions.
Should your patients still get vaccinated? The CDC estimates that about one sixth (15%) of the population of the United States has had influenza, meaning that 85% have not contracted it yet. Their recommendation is for vaccination for both seasonal and pandemic flu—a single dose of each at separate injection sites for people older than 9 years of age and 2 doses separated by 4 weeks for children 6 months to 9 years of age. The original priority groups are still the highest priority for vaccination. The assumptions here are that there will be a flu season, but we cannot predict the strain(s) that will be responsible for it. Only time will tell whether this is sage advice. Of interest, President Barack Obama, First Lady Michelle Obama, and daughters Malia (11 years) and Sasha (8 years) have all received the H1N1 vaccine. The president said he knows that the vaccine is safe.[3]
2009 H1N1 Flu Virus Outbreaks in Animals[4]
Reports from the American Veterinary Medicine Association summarize the available data on 2009 influenza A (H1N1) in domestic animals and livestock:
Cats: 11 cases (Pennsylvania-1, Oregon-6, Colorado-2, Utah-1, Iowa-1) have been reported to have influenza; 8 were virologically confirmed; 4 deaths have occurred; and in 6 cases a human source was identified. One cat was stated to have chronic sinusitis and was treated with oseltamivir, but subsequently died.
Ferrets: 13 cases reported (Nebraska-4, Oregon-9); 1 death.
Dogs: 1 case reported (New York). This dog recovered after 2 days of hospitalization. The Chinese press has also reported 2009 H1N1 in dogs.
Turkeys: An outbreak occurred in a Virginia flock following contact with a human case. A second outbreak occurred later on the same Virginia farm, and positive tests have been reported in turkeys with surveillance cultures in Illinois, Canada, and Chile.
Cheetahs: 4 cheetahs in a cluster of respiratory illnesses occurred in a California zoo. The animals presented with harsh coughs, tachypnea, and rough haircoats. One case was virologically confirmed. All animals recovered in 5-16 days.
Pigs: 12 outbreaks have been reported in Indiana and Minnesota in the United States as well as in Germany, England, Indonesia, Taiwan, Canada, Argentina, Singapore, Ireland, Norway, and Japan. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Research Service has confirmed that meat tissue from infected pigs does not contain the virus at 3, 5, or 7 days after exposure, and pork is not considered a foodborne threat. The USDA has a conditional license for a 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine for pigs.
Commentary. Most cases in pets have been associated with human index cases, and none of these cases were known to represent human disease following animal exposure. The obvious exception is the index case of pig-to-human transmission that occurred at some unknown time and place. Veterinarians maintain that this is a veterinary health issue and not a human health issue. Most of the pets presented with fever, cough, and lethargy. People with flu who have dogs, cats, or ferrets are advised to wash their hands, sneeze into their sleeves, and practice "social distancing" to protect pets. A diagnostic test for the H1N1 virus in pets is available from Innovative Diagnostics and Technologies (IDEXX) laboratories.
Virus of the Year: The Novel H1N1 Influenza[5]
For years, scientists have warned about a pandemic of influenza that might be similar to the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic that is considered the worst epidemic in recorded medical history with 50-100 million deaths, but:
It was supposed to come from Asia: Instead, it came from North America;
It was supposed to be a new strain like avian flu (H5N1): It was simply another form of H1N1;
It was supposed to be severe with high lethality: It was severe in some unpredictable populations, such as children and pregnant women, but overall mortality was only about 0.2%-0.04%; and
It was supposed to cause catastrophe: Instead, it caused confusion.
A Cluster of Oseltamivir-Resistant H1N1 Influenza Cases[6]
This report concerns 10 students in Vietnam who shared a 42-hour train journey. These students did not know each other prior to the journey, and none had known contact with a person with influenza prior to the journey. None of the students were symptomatic during the journey, but 7 developed influenza symptoms within 48 hours after the journey. All 7 of these students had positive reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests for influenza A (H1N1), and all 7 strains had the H275Y substitution that confers resistance to oseltamivir. None of the students had previously received oseltamivir. Six of the 7 students were hospitalized for isolation and 1 student was isolated at home. No additional cases were identified from this cluster.
Commentary. During the 2008-2009 influenza season, a sudden development of oseltamivir resistance occurred in the seasonal influenza A (H1N1) strains, increasing resistance from <> 98% in most areas of the world, including the United States. This change in resistance pattern was unrelated to oseltamivir use. So far, > 98% of pandemic 2009 influenza A (H1N1) strains have been sensitive to oseltamivir, and nearly all resistant strains have been associated with prior oseltamivir use. This cluster of cases in Vietnam demonstrates how a dramatic change in oseltamivir sensitivity without oseltamivir use is possible, which explains the reason for close watching of the new pandemic strain.
Diagnostic Testing for 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Virus in Hospitalized Patients[7]
RT-PCR is the most sensitive test;
The problem with rapid diagnostic tests and immunofluorescence assays is false-negative results;
The best specimens are nasopharyngeal swabs, aspirates or washes, or nasal and throat swabs tested as early in the infection as possible; and
Some patients with negative RT-PCR tests from nasopharyngeal specimens have had positive RT-PCR tests from endotracheal aspirates or bronchoalveolar lavage specimens.
Commentary. The last bulleted point above is relatively new and important information for clinicians. The pandemic strain of influenza binds to the lower airway cells, and this apparently accounts for positive endotracheal aspirates after the upper nasopharyngeal infection has cleared.
Clinical Features of the Initial Cases of 2009 Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) Virus in China[8]
The study concerned 426 travelers with confirmed influenza who were quarantined in 61 hospitals in China. Cases were detected by thermal screening at airports and by contact tracing. The mean patient age was 24 years: Five percent were white; 43% had recently traveled to the United States; and 41% had airplane exposure. Results of interest include the following:
Of 56 million travelers screened
17,909 had fever and a respiratory illness
757 (14 per million) had influenza with the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) strain
Lab tests showed
C-reactive protein > 10 mg/L (31%)
Median CD4 count, 576 cells/µL
White blood cell (WBC) count > 10,000/mm3 (3%)
Mean WBC count, 3440/mm3
Total lymphocyte count, < 15,000/mm3 (68%)
Abnormal chest x-ray (5%) with "patchy infiltrates" in 12 of 14
Abnormal chest computed tomographic (CT) scan (7%)
Symptoms included
Fever (67%)
Cough (70%)
Sputum production (25%)
Sore throat (37%)
Diarrhea (3%)
Nausea (2%)
Viral shedding
Mean of 6 days by RT-PCR
Mean of 3 days after becoming afebrile
Longer with age < 14 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.94)
Longer with delayed oseltamivir treatment (> 48 hours after onset of symptoms [OR 4.5]).
Commentary. Extensive data of this type that are systematically collected in patients who are not very sick are difficult to find. Of note:
Viral shedding persisted an average of 3 days after the patients became afebrile;
Oseltamivir appeared to substantially reduce viral shedding if given within that 48-hour window after the onset of symptoms;
5% had patchy infiltrates on x-ray and 7% had abnormal chest CT scans;
Gastrointestinal symptoms were less common than reported in the US literature; and
Airport screening detected influenza in about 1 of 100,000 travelers.
Pediatric Hospitalizations Associated With 2009 Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) in Argentina[9]
These investigators retrospectively reviewed the experience with 2009 H1N1 infections in 251 children from 6 pediatric hospitals in Buenos Aires. Highlights include the following:
42 of 251 children (17%) had respiratory syncytial virus coinfection;
Median patient age was 10 months, and 75% were ≤ 2 years of age and 60% were ≤ 1 year of age;
Oseltamivir was given within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms in only 11 of 251 (4%);
Suspected bacterial superinfection was present in 25 of 251 children (10%);
Intensive care unit admission was required in 41 (16%), mechanical ventilation in 42 (17%), and 13 died (5%);
Overall death rates in children were 10 times the rates in 2007: 2009, 1.1 of 100,000 children; 2008, 0 of 100,000 children; 2007, 0.1 of 100,000 children;
Death rate for infants < 1 year of age was 7.6 of 100,000; and
9 of 13 children (69%) who died had preexisting illnesses, especially asthma, chronic lung disease, or neurologic disease.
The investigators emphasized that this influenza was associated with an exceptionally high rate of respiratory failure and hypoxemic deaths in children, especially those < 1 year of age.
Commentary. Data from the United States showed that 2009 influenza A (H1N1) was responsible for an estimated 1090 deaths in children, far more than in in any of the 3 previous influenza seasons. This report from Argentina documents the same phenomenon—a 10-fold increase in mortality in children. The mortality rate in children <> 6 months of age, the need for vaccination among care providers of infants < 6 months of age, the importance of vaccine in pregnant women to protect both newborn and mother, and the importance of the new recommendations for oseltamivir in children.
H1N1 Influenza May Increase Maternal Deaths: Importance to Clinicians
A report of a study conducted in California[10] verified the high risk for severe disease among pregnant women and women who have just given birth who are infected with H1N1 influenza virus. Pregnant women accounted for nearly 10% of patients who have died or were hospitalized with H1N1 influenza.
Commentary. The major issues for clinical management of pregnant women with potential influenza are listed below:
Avoid delays in starting oseltamivir. Starting antiviral therapy more than 2 days after the onset of symptoms resulted in a 4.3-fold increase in mortality. In the women who died, the median length of time before oseltamivir was started was 6.5 days after the onset of symptoms.
Rapid tests for influenza are often falsely negative (38% false-negative rate), so antivirals need to be started on the basis of clinical features without reliance on the rapid test results.
Pregnancy is an acknowledged risk for bad outcome with influenza, but the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) has been unusually severe.
Pregnant women are a very high priority for vaccination and should be assured that this vaccine appears to be just as safe in pregnant women as in women who are not pregnant. The added benefit of vaccinating the mother is protection for her newborn infant in the 6 months between delivery and the time when the baby can be vaccinated.
Single Dose of H1N1 Vaccine Needed for Adults, 2 for Children
Randomized clinical trials of the safety and immunogenicity of pandemic H1N1 vaccines were recently conducted in the United States,[11] China,[12] and Hungary.[13] The new research confirms that a single dose of H1N1 vaccine is sufficient for adults, but not for many children.
Commentary. The new data have significance for practitioners. Influenza vaccine potency is determined by the serologic response rate that is conventionally defined as a hemagglutination titer of ≥ 1:40 at 21 days after vaccination. Response rates vary according to the antigen used, the dose, presence or absence of adjuvant (to boost the antigenic response), and the age of the recipient. These 3 trials support current US policy with regard to the following:
Response rates are good after single vaccine doses in persons > 9 years of age.
Children < 9 years of age require 2 doses, presumably because of lack of antigenic experience with flu and/or previous vaccine to this new strain.
The current policy was based on data in regard to the immunogenic response rates to vaccines without adjuvant. The decision was made for products in the United States to be unadjuvanted due to consumer concerns about the safety of adjuvants.
The bottom line is that the current policy is appropriate—a single dose for people > 9 years and 2 doses for children ≤ 9 years. The data are limited for seroresponse rates in high-priority groups in some studies, but most are not characterized by immunodeficiency so there is less concern that most of these groups would respond differently.
Sanofi Pasteur Recalls 800,000 Doses of Pediatric H1N1 Vaccine Due to Deficient Antigen Levels
Sanofi Pasteur recalled approximately 800,000 doses of its pediatric influenza A (H1N1) monovalent vaccine (single-dose, prefilled syringes) because antigen content was lower than required levels. The doses were part of 4 lots shipped in November and intended for children aged 6-35 months.
Commentary. Practitioners should be aware that:
The reduction in antigen in the recalled vaccine lots was modest, so children who received the vaccine probably had an antigenic response;
Revaccination of children vaccinated with recalled vaccine is not necessary; and
There are no safety issues with the recalled lots.
One 15-µg Dose of H1N1 Vaccine May Suffice in Infants and Children
In a study published in JAMA,[14] a single 15-µg dose of vaccine against the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus was safe and immunogenic in infants and children 6 months of age and older. The randomized, observer-blind, age-stratified, parallel-group study was conducted in Australia.
Commentary. The reported study has limitations, and the data may not be applicable to all vaccine products. The current US policy of giving 2 doses of vaccine to children 6 months to 9 years of age should continue.
H1N1 Vaccine to Be Distributed Soon to Countries That Need It
In early 2010, Azerbaijan, Afghanistan, and Mongolia will be the first 3 countries to receive H1N1 influenza vaccine from donations made by manufacturers to the World Health Organization (WHO). In response to requests by WHO to donate vaccine supplies, 6 manufacturers in 12 countries agreed to provide a total of 180 million vaccine doses. These will be distributed to 95 countries that need vaccines. Countries in the northern hemisphere are the first targets for vaccine distribution because H1N1 activity remains high in those areas.
Commentary. The primary responsibility of most governments is to protect its citizens. Thus, the countries that can afford to make or buy vaccine will use most of it for its own population. The policy of the United States has been to allocate10% of its vaccine supply to resource-limited countries. WHO plans to give each country enough vaccine to protect 10% of its population, with the first 2% targeted to healthcare workers. To put these figures into perspective, the current US vaccine supply is about 110 million doses, enough to vaccinate about 35% of the population. Total use to date is estimated at 60 million doses or about 20% of the US population.

Decolonizing Nasal Carriers May Reduce Surgical-Site Staphylococcus aureus Infections

Laurie Barclay, MD

January 6, 2010 — Rapid screening and decolonizing of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriers on admission reduces hospital-acquired, surgical-site S. aureus infections, according to the results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial reported in the January 7 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.
"Nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus are at increased risk for health care–associated infections with this organism," write Lonneke G.M. Bode, MD, from Erasmus University Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, and colleagues. "Decolonization of nasal and extranasal sites on hospital admission may reduce this risk."
The goal of the study was to determine whether using a real-time polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) assay to rapidly identify S. aureus nasal carriers, followed by treatment with mupirocin nasal ointment and chlorhexidine soap, would lower the risk for hospital-associated S. aureus infection.
From October 2005 through June 2007, the investigators screened 6771 patients on admission and identified 1270 nasal swabs from 1251 patients that were positive for S. aureus. Of 917 of these patients enrolled in the intent-to-treat analysis, 808 (88.1%) underwent a surgical procedure.
All of the S. aureus strains identified with PCR assay were susceptible to methicillin and mupirocin. In the mupirocin-chlorhexidine group, 17 (3.4%) of 504 patients developed S. aureus infections vs 32 (7.7%) of 413 patients in the placebo group. Therefore, relative risk for infection was 0.42 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 - 0.75).
For deep surgical-site infections, mupirocin-chlorhexidine treatment had an even greater effect (relative risk, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07 - 0.62). All-cause in-hospital mortality rate did not differ significantly between groups. Compared with the mupirocin-chlorhexidine group, the placebo group had shorter time to onset of nosocomial infection (P = .005).
"The number of surgical-site S. aureus infections acquired in the hospital can be reduced by rapid screening and decolonizing of nasal carriers of S. aureus on admission," the study authors write. "This intervention also significantly reduced the mean hospital stay by almost 2 days."
Limitations of this study include needed modification in the study design because of a perceived change in the overall cumulative incidence of S. aureus infections and difficulty making inferences about nonsurgical patients.
"Mupirocin and chlorhexidine are considered to be relatively safe," the study authors conclude. "However, since S. aureus strains can become resistant to mupirocin, we recommend restricting the use of this agent to known carriers who are at risk for infection."
In an accompanying editorial, Richard P. Wenzel, MD, from Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, discusses minimizing surgical-site infections, based on this study and a second study evaluating preoperative surgical scrubs.
"The weight of evidence suggests that chlorhexidine–alcohol should replace povidone–iodine as the standard for preoperative surgical scrubs," Dr. Wenzel writes. "The use of intranasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine baths for carriers of S. aureus who have been identified preoperatively by means of a real-time [PCR] assay could be reserved primarily for patients who are undergoing cardiac surgery, all patients receiving an implant, and all immunosuppressed surgical candidates. Currently, the incremental value of preoperative baths with chlorhexidine alone for all surgical patients is unclear, but this relatively straightforward procedure could be examined critically in future studies."
Grants from ZonMw, Mölnlycke Health Care (formerly Regent Medical), GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, bioMérieux, and 3M supported this study. Some of the study authors have disclosed various financial relationships with 3M, Wyeth, Destiny Pharma, Becton Dickinson, bioMérieux, Pfizer, Cardinal Health, JohnsonDiversey, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and/or Cepheid. Dr. Wenzel has received speaking fees from 3M and research funding and consultation fees from Pfizer.
N Engl J Med. 2010;362:9-17, 75-77.

miércoles, 9 de diciembre de 2009

Two Novel Cleaning Methods Remove Most Bacteria from Hospital Rooms


From Medscape Medical News

Barbara Boughton

September 23, 2009 (San Francisco, California) — Two novel methods for cleaning hospital rooms are not only easy to use, they are more effective than standard disinfection for removing hardy bacteria, researchers announced here at the 49th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC).
Results of 2 studies on new cleaning methods show that they can reduce bacteria, including hard-to-remove Clostridium difficile spores, by almost 90%, according to researchers. One method uses an automated ultraviolet (UV) radiation device, and the other uses ultramicrofiber cloths and mops containing a copper-based biocide. The cleaning system with ultramicrofiber cloths, mops, and copper biocide also has a preventive residual effect, protecting surfaces from bacteria for hours after cleaning, researchers said.
In the Mayday Hospital Cleaning study, British investigators from London compared standard cleaning with mops, chlorine, and water, and cleaning with ultramicrofiber mops and cloths with water or with a copper biocide. Sampling for bacteria was performed 1 hour before and 1 hour after cleaning at 10 different sites on 4 hospital wards. Each site was cleaned using each of the 3 different methods. The study took place over 12 weeks.
Results revealed that cleaning with the ultramicrofiber mops and cloths plus copper biocide removed 80% to 85% of bacteria, and the analysis indicated that both the ultramicrofiber material and biocide contributed to these results. The antibacterial effect of the copper biocide persisted for 23 hours after cleaning. The study confirms the ability of ultramicrofiber to more effectively remove dirt, but the copper biocide was needed for bacterial control, the authors said in their poster at ICAAC.
"Other studies have found that microfiber mops are better than cotton ones," said John Boyce, MD, chief of the Infectious Diseases Section at the Hospital of Saint Raphael and clinical professor of medicine at Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut. Dr. Boyce was not involved with the study.
"The authors are to be commended for documenting the effects of a new kind of disinfectant or biocide that can be used in healthcare settings that also has a residual antibacterial effect," he said. Dr. Boyce noted that other novel compounds with antibacterial effects are being investigated by different teams of researchers, including those that contain copper and silver.
In another study presented at ICAAC, researchers used an automated UV radiation device to decontaminate hospital rooms at the Cleveland Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center in Ohio, and analyzed its ability to remove troublesome bacteria, including C. difficile spores. The Tru-D device, manufactured by Lumalier in Memphis, Tennessee, uses UVC radiation for decontamination.
Tru-D reduced methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bacteria by 89% and C. difficile spores by 83% in hospital rooms.
The Tru-D device was able to decontaminate all surfaces in 40 hospital rooms, including hard-to-clean surfaces such as the undersides of tables, said lead researcher Curtis Donskey, MD, chair of the Infection Control Committee at the Cleveland VA Medical Center. After testing, the researchers found that Tru-D cleaning removed all MRSA on the undersides of bedside tables, whereas 18% of sites tested after standard hospital cleaning remained contaminated with the bacteria.
C. difficile spores are especially challenging for hospital staff, since they can only be removed by soaking surfaces in bleach for 8 to 10 minutes, Dr. Donskey said in an interview with Medscape Infectious Diseases. The UV radiation device is computerized, and once placed in a room and turned on, can assess how much power is needed for decontamination by measuring the reflected UV radiation from surfaces in the room, Dr. Donskey said. It requires no special training to use. However, because the UV radiation produced can be dangerous to people, the device is placed in a closed, empty room, and operated with a remote control by housekeeping staff located outside the room. A sensor at the door turns the machine off if anyone enters the room.
Although the cost is steep, running from $75,000 to $100,000 per unit, it's inexpensive to operate; it requires no cleaning supplies and uses a small amount of electricity. Dr. Donskey has already put in a request for several units to the administration of the Cleveland VA Medical Center. The next step in his research is to incorporate the Tru-D into the standard cleaning routine of the housekeeping staff at the Center, and to assess how easy it is for "real world" housekeepers to use it as part of their daily routine.
UVC radiation is an exciting new technology for disinfecting patient rooms and contaminated surfaces in healthcare, said Luke Chen, MBBS, FRACP, assistant professor of medicine in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina. UVC technology has been used to disinfect water, to reduce food-borne microorganisms, and to purify air, he said, and is now being tested by the healthcare industry.
"UVC technology represents a major step forward for disinfection in hospitals and patient care areas," Dr. Chen explained. "The Tru-D device demonstrated consistency and rapidity in killing microorganisms." The safety profile in the study appeared to be good, but further research is needed to validate this finding, Dr. Chen said.
"There is potential to use this technology to rapidly clean and turn around patient rooms, clinic space, or waiting rooms," he added. "The technology could also be adapted for disinfection of surfaces of healthcare equipment, for example, monitoring devices, wheelchairs, and ventilators. Overall, I think technologies like this are versatile and are likely to be widely used."
Dr. Boyce noted that the advantages of the Tru-D device are that it is easy to employ and that it can reduce the number of positive bacterial cultures substantially. "It would be interesting to compare this device with other new methods for decontaminating hospital rooms," Dr. Boyce said.
In 2008, Dr. Boyce published a study on a disinfection system using vaporized hydrogen peroxide (Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29:723-729). "Our data so far indicate that it reduces contamination to virtually 0," he said. However, unlike the UV radiation device, the vaporized hydrogen peroxide system requires 4 to 6 hours to clean a room and operators with special training to manage it, Dr. Donskey said.
"The UV radiation device has the potential to be effective, faster, and less expensive to operate — a good supplement to bleach or more effective than bleach," he said.

Dr. Boyce reports being a consultant to Bioquell, 3M, Clorox, Advanced Sterilization Products, and Cardinal Health. Dr. Donskey and Dr. Chen have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

49th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC): Abstracts K-2107a and K-2107b. Presented September 15, 2009.

Authors and Disclosures
Journalist
Barbara Boughton
Barbara Boughton is a freelance writer for Medscape.

Las Creencias Religiosas se Debilitan por el Avance Científico


Yaiza Martínez


Si el conflicto entre conocimiento científico y creencias religiosas no ha sido tan importante en sí mismo, al menos hay cuatro fuentes de tensión entre ciencia y religión que sí que han sido relevantes.
Steven Weinberg, físico estadounidense ganador del Premio Nobel de física en 1979 por combinar el electromagnetismo y la fuerza nuclear débil en el Modelo electrodébil, escribe en un reciente artículo publicado por The New York Review of Books acerca del conflicto derivado de la expansión de la ciencia y el debilitamiento paralelo de las creencias religiosas.
Según Weinberg, la idea del conflicto entre ciencia y religión es antigua. Edward Gibbon, historiador británico del siglo XVIII, ya señaló que “el estudio de la naturaleza es el síntoma más seguro de una mente incrédula”.
Weinberg, por su parte, afirma que aunque la ciencia y la religión no sean del todo incompatibles –tal y como lo señalan científicos muy creyentes como Charles Townes o Francis Collins-, la confluencia de ambas ha ido debilitando gradualmente las creencias religiosas, especialmente en Occidente, donde la ciencia está más avanzada.
Cuatro fuentes de tensión
¿Cuáles son las causas de esta tensión? Para Weinberg, el hecho de que existan contradicciones entre los descubrimientos científicos y las doctrinas religiosas específicas no sería una de las causas. Estas contradicciones se han dado muchas veces a lo largo de las historia, y generalmente el conocimiento científico ha terminado siendo adoptado por las personas con mayor visión entre los grupos religiosos.
Pero si el conflicto entre conocimiento científico y creencias religiosas no ha sido tan importante en sí mismo, al menos hay cuatro fuentes de tensión entre ciencia y religión que sí que han sido relevantes.
La primera de ellas es el hecho de que la religión haya tomado gran parte de su fuerza de la observación de fenómenos misteriosos como los terremotos, las enfermedades, los truenos, etc, que parecerían requerir para su existencia de la intervención de algún ser divino.
A medida que el tiempo ha ido pasando, esos misterios se han ido explicando desde una perspectiva cada vez más naturalista. Evidentemente, la ciencia no ha podido explicar todo ni podrá hacerlo nunca pero, lo más importante es que, según Weinberg, no ha constatado nunca nada que requiera de una intervención sobrenatural para su explicación.
Transformación del auto-concepto humano
Una segunda fuente de tensión entre religión y ciencia se deriva del hecho de que las explicaciones científicas hayan aumentado las dudas del rol especial del ser humano en el mundo.
El ser humano ha pasado de considerarse un actor creado por Dios para desempeñar su papel en un gran drama cósmico de pecado y salvación a tener que aceptar que nuestro hogar, la Tierra, es tan sólo otro planeta más que gira alrededor del sol; que nuestro sol es tan sólo una estrella entre cientos de miles de millones de estrellas de una galaxia que, además, está entre miles de millones de galaxias visibles.
Otro descubrimiento importante, y que también cambiaría el concepto que teníamos de nosotros mismos, fue el realizado por Charles Darwin, que señaló que el ser humano es un producto de la evolución a partir de animales que nos precedieron. Es decir, que no existe un plan divino que explique la existencia de la humanidad.
En ciencia no hay profetas infalibles
La cuarta fuente de tensión entre ciencia y religión es la siguiente: las religiones tradicionales se basan en la autoridad, representada por un líder infalible (un profeta, un Papa, un Imán) o por un texto sagrado, como la Biblia o el Corán.
Los científicos se apoyan también en autoridades, pero de otra índole. Si quiero comprender la teoría de la relatividad, buscaré información escrita por un experto. Pero siempre sé que dicho experto podría estar equivocado. Para los científicos, ni siquiera los héroes de la ciencia, como Einstein, son considerados como profetas infalibles.
Weinberg señala que su propósito no es argumentar que el declive de las creencias religiosas sea algo bueno (aunque el físico piensa que sí lo es), sino más bien explicar las razones que han llevado a la pérdida de la fe en los últimos tiempos. Señala asimismo que hay que tener mucho cuidado con los sustitutos de la fe: regímenes que rechazaban la religión cometieron grandes atrocidades con la población, como la Alemania nazi o la Rusia de Stalin.
Finalmente, Weinberg apunta que no diría que es fácil vivir sin Dios y que la ciencia es lo único que se necesita. Porque, por más que se avance en el estudio de la naturaleza, los científicos son conscientes de que nunca podrán alcanzar el fondo final de las cosas. Para ayudar a aceptar este hecho, el físico propone la ayuda del humor, de los placeres sencillos de la vida y del placer del arte.
Según Weinberg, “podríamos estar tristes porque no se escriba más poesía religiosa en el futuro… pero, por supuesto, se podrá también escribir buena poesía en adelante sin la religión”. En definitiva, señala el físico, no debemos preocuparnos con que la superación de la religión conduzca a una decadencia moral porque muchas personas no religiosas han vivido vidas moralmente ejemplares.
Publicado originalmente en Bolsón Web (Argentina)